Product Description

Government supported junk social science-or "sanctified snake oil" as Sarnoff terms it-exists in all policy arenas along the entire political spectrum, as policy advocates seek to justify the continuation of ineffective programs and to block alternative solutions. This form of junk science is particularly dangerous and wasteful in terms of tax dollars because professional confirmation, media "investigation" and government support lend it an unwarranted imprimatur of validity. Sarnoff argues that it confuses the public and convinces them to support programs as ends in themselves, rather than determining whether or not such efforts actually achieve purported goals.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #2707545 in Books
• Published on: 2001-03-30
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Binding: Hardcover
• 248 pages

Review
“...this work raises valid questions regarding the accuracy and validity of the data and research on which policy decisions are often based. Recommended for upper-division undergraduates and above.”–Choice

“[T]his volume promises to be the most controversial and must-read book since Specht and Courtney's Unfaithful Angels: How Social Work Has Lost Its Mission hit the shelves. No, this is not your typical academic book, it is original, dynamic and very thought-provoking.... Sanctified Snake Oil is a compelling and fascinating work which would make an excellent addition to any graduate research or women's studies course or book club discussion group.”–Katherine van Wormer Professor of Social Work University of Northern Iowa Coauthor of Women and the Criminal Justice System

“The snake oil deal with in the private sphere is bad enough, but when the government endorses junk sciences, and not just in the court of public opinion but in actual courts of law, we need to stand up and fight back, as Susan Sarnoff has done in this brilliant tour de force of skeptical analysis. Sanctified Snake Oil should be read by every member of congress, as well as law makers throughout the land.”–Michael Shermer Publisher Skeptics Society and Skeptic Magazine

“Thomas Sowell says that `social' is an adjective whose function is to negate the noun it modifies, and too much `social science' seems to confirm that insight. Susan Sarnoff has compiled a frightening dossier of junk social science, with even more disturbing evidence about the role of government and the media in supporting junk science. Few readers will comfortably accept Sarnoff's argument in every case, but anyone concerned with social science and public policy should think carefully about the evidence she presents.”–David Boaz Executive Vice President Cato Institute Author of Libertarianism: A Primer

About the Author
SUSAN KISS SARNOFF is an Assistant Professor of Social Work at Ohio University.