Product Description

TOP TEN REASONS WHY REPUBLICANS SUCK

10. They're so incompetent they couldn't pour pee out of a boot if you wrote the instructions on the heel.

9. They lie like a rug. They lie like a dog. They lie like . . . ummm . . . a dog's rug. We mean, they just lie all the time.

8. They're a pack of crooks.

7. They are unbearably sanctimonious.

6. They have no sense of humor.

5. They're losing the war on terror.

4. They've put our economic future in Beijing's hands.

3. They steal elections.

2. Oh, yeah. They're destroying the planet, too.

1. They suck up to power.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #1267287 in Books
• Published on: 2006-09-05
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Binding: Paperback
• 384 pages

Features

• ISBN13: 9780743277532
• Condition: NEW
• Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
• Click here to view our Condition Guide and Shipping Prices

From Publishers Weekly
An intelligent, carefully outlined strategy to seize power from the Republicans and restore it to its rightful place slightly left of center, this book (despite Carville's "Ragin' Cajun" claim to gonzo liberalism) is remarkably reasonable and cleverly calculated to appeal to a broad spectrum of Americans. Carville and Begala have a solid grasp of the issues that concern the majority of citizens: moral values, political corruption, taxes, health care, energy issues and, of course, the war in Iraq. They are most persuasive when arguing for seemingly common-sense policies: their energy plan-conservation, environmental remediation and making a "real commitment to alternative fuels"-is based on the handling of the energy crisis of the 1970s that saw the U.S. cut energy use and oil imports while growing the GDP. Regarding health care, the authors argue for allowing employers to buy into the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program, which offers 180 different plans to 9 million government employees. Some of the authors' arguments are harder to swallow; for example, the extremely speculative notion that had Al Gore been elected president, 9/11 could have been averted. And criticism of Republican leadership often devolves into name-calling and mudslinging. (Jack Abramoff, in a stroke of timely luck, receives his own section titled "The King of Republican Sleaze.") That aside, Carville's and Begala's book is a refreshing entry into a field long overcrowded by polarized, pedantic screeds.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From The Washington Post
The most interesting thing about James Carville and Paul Begala's new book is its subtitle. The two authors grace the cover, looking as if they want to punch someone. Across their torsos scream the words "Take It Back." And underneath, the subtitle reads "Our Party, Our Country, Our Future." The second two phrases are self-explanatory. Carville and Begala are the quintessential Democratic partisans -- of course, they want to wrest America and its posterity from the GOP. It's the first phrase that contains the mystery. Whom, exactly, do Carville and Begala want to take "our party" back from? After all, Carville and Begala are the two most influential Democratic operatives of the last decade and a half. They helped elect Bill Clinton, and, ever since, they have sat at the epicenter of the Clinton alumni network that represents the closest thing the Democratic Party has to an establishment. How can they take back a party which, as much as anyone, they already control? The most honest answer -- reading between the lines -- is that Carville and Begala want to rescue the Democratic Party from the political consultants who succeeded them. One of the minor dramas of both the Gore and Kerry campaigns was the candidates' decision to rely heavily on strategists outside the Clinton orbit (most notably, Bob Shrum). Carville and Begala don't name names, but they are smart, funny and ruthless in dissecting the mistakes and idiocies of the Democratic campaigns of 2000, 2002 and 2004. The book is most convincing when it is most elitist -- a kind of "why can't anyone play this game" attack on the Democratic Party's inability to find strategists as talented as they are. But while such a book might titillate readers of insider blogs like the Note, no one else would much care. So Take It Back creates a fictional party elite -- composed of "mushy-spined mealy-mouthed wimps ... Pollyannas who deny there's a problem ... accommodationists who think being a lighter shade of Republican is the key to survival." The members of this elite go nameless. In fact, Carville and Begala pointedly exonerate Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader in the House, and Harry M. Reid, the Democratic leader in the Senate, and praise both Kerry and Gore. Carville and Begala portray themselves as populist outsiders fuming with anger at their party's leaders -- except that since those leaders are mostly their friends, they repeatedly pummel a phantom. Why do they feel the need? Why not just write an anti-Bush book that offers tips for how Democrats can regain power? Why denounce as spineless and corrupt the very Democratic establishment they helped create? Because Carville and Begala know that liberal activists -- their target audience -- have for several years now been almost as angry at the Democratic Party leadership as at President Bush. Howard Dean's 2003-04 primary campaign was one long rebellion against the Washington Democratic establishment, and the liberal blogosphere he helped spawn has made anti-Beltway populism its rallying cry ever since. During the primaries, the centrist Democratic Leadership Council interpreted Dean's campaign as an ideological attack on Clintonism itself and fired back. But now, with Dean chairing the Democratic National Committee and his followers playing an increasingly powerful role in the party, Carville and Begala are pursuing a more subtle strategy: co-option. The book's rhetoric is classic Dean, circa 2003: Washington Democrats lack the guts to take on President Bush. For Dean and his Internet progeny, however, this critique has two key implications: First, Democrats should shift power out of Washington and toward grassroots activists. And second, Democrats should not compromise their principles, even on unpopular issues, because that would simply reaffirm what many Americans already suspect: that Democrats don't believe in anything. Carville and Begala, by contrast, while flaying a mythic party elite, don't want to turn power over to the activists. How could they? While the Deaniacs loathe political consultants, the authors are political consultants. "No one pines for the days of amateur attorneys or amateur doctors," they argue. But today, many grassroots Democrats do pine for the days of amateur politics. In Take It Back, Carville and Begala are trying to pull a bait and switch -- hijacking the Deaniacs' outsider rhetoric while retaining the insider structure that the Deaniacs revile. What's more, Carville and Begala, while repeatedly saying that the Democrats need to stand for something, clearly believe the party must compromise on some signature issues. Their discussions of gun control, abortion and gay marriage are politically shrewd and coldly realistic: They want Democrats to swallow a ban on "partial-birth" abortion and live with parental consent for minors seeking to end a pregnancy; to forego any new federal gun control laws; and to give up, for the foreseeable future, not only on gay marriage but on overturning "don't ask, don't tell" in the military as well. Carville and Begala are probably right that such cultural concessions could help Democrats win back some of the working-class whites who have abandoned them in droves. But they never reconcile these proposed compromises with their call for a party that stands on principle. Once again, Carville and Begala are trying to wrap the politics of Clinton in the language of Dean. In their hearts, Carville and Begala are Clintonites: They think liberal activists are valuable but only if harnessed by political professionals with a keen eye for the swing-voting center. The best thing about Take It Back is its smart tips for how to update the strategy they employed so winningly in 1992 for 2008 and beyond. But the most telling thing about Take It Back is its unwillingness to argue frankly for such a strategy -- because doing so would lead them into conflict with the increasingly powerful party activists who see the Clinton model as obsolete or worse. Carville and Begala may think they are the ones doing the co-opting, but the truth may be closer to the reverse. Peter Beinart is the editor of the New Republic and the author of the forthcoming "The Good Fight: Why Liberals -- and Only Liberals -- Can Win the War on Terror and Make America Great Again."

Reviewed by Peter Beinart
Copyright 2006, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.

From Booklist
With the inimitable styles for which they are known, Democratic political consultants Carville and Begala dissect the 2000 and 2004 elections when Republicans triumphed over Democrats and take a long-range look at the national impact of the Bush-Cheney years. Rather than cry over the recent losses, Carville and Begala applaud the strengths of the Republicans and strongly advise the Democrats to recast the respective images of the two parties and take the lead on social and cultural issues. On abortion, Democrats need to stand up to pressure groups and advocate to reduce the need for abortions; on gun control, they should respect gun owners and enforce the laws already on the books; on Iraq, they should challenge Bush to win the war and respect the military; on energy, they should push for independence on oil; on taxes, they should advocate for taxation of wealth. Citing numerous instances of Democrats shying from identification with religion, the consultants strongly advise that those who have such beliefs should express them, and the party should point to the religious basis of policies to provide for the poor and protect the environment. With great humor and frequent jabs at the Bush administration--Louisiana native Carville is particularly incensed about the handling of the New Orleans flooding--these consultants offer a thoughtful and passionate appeal for change in the Democratic Party and the nation. Vanessa Bush
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

Customer Reviews

Pick it up, Read it and try to refute the facts
I was challenged by a friend to read this and try to refute the facts brought up by the authors about the current rampant corruption in the Republican Party. Honestly, as a former Republican voter, I have to agree with the authors.

1. The current Republican Party is not my father's party, nor the party I thought it was.

2. The amount of corruption in this Republican Party and current administration would make turn of the century Robber Barons blush.

3. The evidence cited in the book is irrefutable. The current Republican Party and current administration do not have our (Americans) best interests at heart. To them it is Party first, Greed second and maybe, Americans a distant third.

Lastly, what makes this book all the more readable is the fact that they (authors) own up to the horrible mistakes made by the democrats in the last two presidential elections. I hate to admit it, but if democratic strategists follow the steps to 'take back' the government, as outlined in this book, my former party is in big trouble.

Sun Tzu for the Democrats in the Age of Bush
This is the first truly ground-breaking contribution to the "How on earth can Democrats win if they couldn't even beat Bush in 2004?" genre. Carville and Begala stake out a position that bridges the gap between bold Progressivism and DLC-style triangulation.

Make no mistake about it: while this book calls for a big tent attitude on issues like abortion, it is decidely NOT another rallying cry for a retreat to the center. Contrasting their vision to the moderate, wishy-woshy "something for everyone" campaigns Democrats have waged (and usually lost) in recent years, Carville and Begala demonstrate that Democrats can win when they have a strong, simple message rooted in morality and principle. They make a persuasive case that an anti-corruption, pro-energy independence, pro-tax fairness, and pro-health care agenda is both good policy and good politics. Best of all, they do so with considerable wit and charm, annihilating the common Republican depiction of liberals as "elitist" and "politically correct." In both content and form, an indispensable guide to progressive political strategy.

Good Medicine for Democrats!
For any Democrat depressed or disillusioned about our country's future, this is just what the doctor ordered.

Carville and Begala tell us why achieving real reform isn't about moving left or veering right. It's about staking out clear positions and fighting for them -- on affordable health, national security, energy independence, tax reform and more.

They challenge Democrats to put their faith into action, and refuse to sit back and let extremists define America's values. They remind us that it's the Bible, after all, that says, "Be not afraid," and that Democrats can't be timid, weak or wishy-washing on values debates.

Here's the bottom line: this is a powerful book that, if followed, will help Democrats win the White House back. It's clear that Carville and Begala are more than brilliant political strategists. They are true-believers that want our country to do better.