Land of the Dead (Unrated Edition)
|
| List Price: | $14.98 |
| Price: | $10.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details |
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com
138 new or used available from $1.38
Average customer review:Product Details
- Amazon Sales Rank: #25570 in DVD
- Released on: 2005-10-18
- Rating: NR (Not Rated)
- Aspect ratio: 2.35:1
- Formats: AC-3, Color, Director's Cut, Dolby, DTS Surround Sound, Dubbed, DVD-Video, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
- Original language: English, French, Italian, Polish, Spanish
- Subtitled in: English, French, Spanish
- Dubbed in: French
- Number of discs: 1
- Running time: 97 minutes
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com
Bolstered by the success of 28 Days Later, Shaun of the Dead, the Resident Evil movies and the hit remake of his own Dawn of the Dead, George A. Romero returns to the horror subgenre he invented with Land of the Dead. The fourth installment in Romero's zombie cycle (and the first since 1985's Day of the Dead) presents a logical progression of events since 1968's horror classic Night of the Living Dead: Zombies (also known as "stenches" for their rotting odor) are the dominant population, and they've begun to show signs of undead intelligence and gathering power. The wealthiest survivors live comfortably in a luxury high-rise within a barricaded safe zone, ignoring the horrors of the outside world while armed scavengers stage raids in the zombie-zone to gather much-needed food and supplies. Simon Baker and John Leguizamo play mercenaries-for-hire; Dennis Hopper is their nefarious boss; and horror favorite Asia Argento (daughter of Suspiria director Dario Argento) plays a former hooker recruited into Baker's scavenger squad. While none of this seems particularly fresh or inspired, Land of the Dead benefits from hints of the social satire that made Romero's earlier zombie films so memorable. Not so much funny as gruesomely peculiar, Romero's plot isn't as inventive as it could've been, but as a big-scale B-movie, Land of the Dead delivers a handful of shocks and horror-celebrity cameos (including gore-masters Tom Savini and Greg Nicotero) that should keep horror buffs happy until the next zombie opus comes along. --Jeff Shannon
From The New Yorker
The godfather of zombie movies does his fourth dance with the dead in this take-no-prisoners horror opus. The setting is pure urban jungle-the poor live on the streets, the rich live in gleaming high-rises, and an electrified fence surrounding the city keeps the zombies at bay. It all goes to hell, of course, as it has many times before, but Romero's wit and gross outrageousness are still unequalled. There's a surprisingly strong class-warfare subtext at work here that's sweepingly entertaining, and Romero wisely guides his actors (Dennis Hopper and Asia Argento among them) through the bloody muck and mire with revolutionary enthusiasm.-Bruce Diones -Bruce Diones
Copyright © 2006 The New Yorker
Customer Reviews
LAND OF THE DEAD ROCKS!
5 STARS ALL THE WAY!
why should you buy this movie?
Asia Argento nuff said!
Decent Zombie Fix - Dumb Movie
It's pretty rare I run into a post-apoc flick featuring zombies I don't like and this one was only very nearly an exception but even I had to reinflate my belief suspension waterwings a few times to handle the film's blatant, sometimes staggering stupidity.
Romero's reach for social commentary via the undead appears to have exceeded his grasp of how even a world where the dead come back to the life has to adhere to other rules that support the likely.
The rich are rich because they have the most cash? How does this compute in a post-apoc/post-federal reserve world with miles and miles of untended cash registers for the plundering?
What need was there for a highly unlikely heavily reengineered massive all-terrain assault vehicle built from the remains of a train engine when a military vehicle or something a little more A-Team/Mad Max would have sufficed?
I liked that he extended the idea of the zombies getting smarter first put forward in Day of the Dead as this could have some interesting ramifications for their origin, but it felt a bit silly and poorly executed.
That said, it's zombies. It's got Dennis Hopper. It's post-apoc. If that sounds like it's enough for you it probably is. But it doesn't hold a candle to contemporaries 28 Days Later and the Dawn of the Dead remake.
Romero's redemption, and a movie "about" Zombies.
When the moment i've been waiting for more than a decade finally arrived and passed, my heart was divided. The movie was great and i liked it as entertainment, but what about my zombie-film fan backup, the one that took me years to put togheter and get to love? Let's check the two usual and controversial points in Romero's "Living Dead" features, in this last version of the saga he invented:
-THE HORROR MOVIE: Great, spectacular, entertaining, creepy, menacing, disturbing, dark, atmospheric action and horror film after all. Romero's redemption finally arrived after his last and less effective "day of the dead" feature. In this movie, he manages to create the tense and gruesome atmosphere for the "End of the World" scenario he always wanted. We can apreciate from the first scene every detailed aspect of the Zombie apocalypse on the planet, the hopeless and despaired remaining humans living like rats, going outside armed to the teet looking for suplies ,shooting around like crazy cowboys, but breathing the zombie terror in every desperate minute. There is absolutely no hope. Humanity's fate finally came down in one of the most visceral and dark catastrophes ever portrayed on film. The gates of hell are open: behold the zombie hordes taking over the World.
Great fast-action horrific and tense story, simple and straight forward, in a great acomplished ambient anybody could possibly achieve for the zombie menace. The morbid tale with the right ambient finally came, but....
-THE ZOMBIE CULTURE: What is going on here? Is romero trying to take his mythology to a new level? I guess the professor's "Pet" Zombie and his experiments back in "day of the dead" were for real, at least for Romero. For me, Zombies don't have to necesary be the theme, only a mean to create terror, right? So what's this "social behaviour" thing going on between zombies, this new leadership issue and the "compassion" showed for each other? I know they move in groups, are helpful to each other and share the task to destroy humanity, but this is too much: Now, they are self-aware, they almost have feelings, they provide mutual colaboration, they use weapons instead of tools, they have a leader? They're still cannibal vicious creatures, thank god, but this new zombie society putted me down. No matter how many people they dismember and eat alive, i just can't get over the last scene:"they only want to be left alone, in peace" NOOOO... Why did they invaded the city in the first place? To get filled with human flesh and leave in peace? We're cool now? Maybe we are taken this issue too seriously.
Anyway, for the fantastic portrayal of the zombie apocalypse on earth , the struggle of the remaining mand-kind and the lost humanity in this new, raw, and cruel world, survival techniques and display of military power, for Tom Savini, the great story, and any implied social propaganda, thank you Romero.
For the zombie culture aspect, i guess in a few more years we will have to ask the zombies what's really going on. Don't mind me, this is a very entertaining film, i recomend it for anybody who's up for real chilling screams! Then you tell me if Romero was "eaten" by his own myth.
The DVD edition is great, the extras are much like endless humurous documentaries, but the interviews are interesting. Find out why the master did what he did. Enjoy the Uncut Edition or the Original theatrical edition, it's all good.



![The Thing [HD DVD]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51CVW5MTMVL._SL75_.jpg)
