Product Description

Studio: Lions Gate Home Ent. Release Date: 01/08/2008 Run time: 21 minutes Rating: R

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #314 in DVD
• Brand: Lionsgate
• Released on: 2006-06-27
• Rating: R (Restricted)
• Aspect ratio: 2.35:1
• Formats: Anamorphic, Color, Dolby, DTS Surround Sound, THX
• Original language: English
• Subtitled in: English, Spanish
• Number of discs: 1
• Dimensions: 3.00 pounds
• Running time: 137 minutes

Amazon.com essential video
After he pushed the envelope of computer-generated special effects in The Abyss, director James Cameron turned this hotly anticipated sequel to Terminator into a well-written, action-packed showcase for advanced special effects and for one of the most invincible villains ever imagined. Terminator 2: Judgment Day is a legitimate sequel: there's more story to tell about a hulking, leather-clad android (Arnold Schwarzenegger) who arrives from the future to protect a rebellious teenager and future leader (Edward Furlong) from being killed by the tenacious T-1000 robot (Robert Patrick), whose liquid-metal construction makes him seemingly unstoppable. The fate of the future lies in the balance, with Linda Hamilton (who would later marry her director) reprising her role as the rugged woman whose son will change the course of history. --Jeff Shannon

Amazon.com
After he pushed the envelope of computer-generated special effects in The Abyss, director James Cameron turned this hotly anticipated sequel to Terminator into a well-written, action-packed showcase for advanced special effects and for one of the most invincible villains ever imagined. Terminator 2: Judgment Day is a legitimate sequel: there's more story to tell about a hulking, leather-clad android (Arnold Schwarzenegger) who arrives from the future to protect a rebellious teenager and future leader (Edward Furlong) from being killed by the tenacious T-1000 robot (Robert Patrick), whose liquid-metal construction makes him seemingly unstoppable. The fate of the future lies in the balance, with Linda Hamilton (who would later marry her director) reprising her role as the rugged woman whose son will change the course of history. --Jeff Shannon

From The New Yorker
The killer cyborg who was played by Arnold Schwarzenegger in the original "Terminator" (1984) has returned-only this time he's the hero. The first film, which was written and directed by James Cameron, is one of the genre-movie classics of the eighties: a lean, witty science-fiction movie without great pretensions to significance. The sequel, also written (with William Wisher) and directed by Cameron, is far less satisfying. The picture is full of spectacular action sequences and dazzling special effects, but the narrative doesn't have the snap of the original's: it's lumbering and monotonous, and it carries a heavy-handed anti-nuke message. The old, Schwarzenegger-model Terminator (the T-800) had been superseded by a more advanced model, the T-1000 (Robert Patrick), who is sleeker and more versatile. T-800, who represented the ultimate in destructive technology in the first film, seems almost human here: compared to T-1000, he's a vulnerable guy (or guyoid). The whole movie is based on the insane conceit that Arnold Schwarzenegger is the underdog. That a stretch. Also with Linda Hamilton, Edward Furlong, and Joe Morton. Effects by Stan Winston and many, many others. -Terrence Rafferty
Copyright © 2006 The New Yorker

Customer Reviews

The Best Arnold Movie
I think this is the best of all of Arnold's movies. It was directed by James Cameron (director of the Titanic) who's known to be a perfectionist and it shows. The dialogue and action sequences are sharp, and the movie benefits from the Blu-ray upgrade. The only downfall of the movie is that it suffers from the unkillable bad guy. Every time you think he's dead he comes back to life. That is forgivable, however, because it is a common thread to scary/action type movies.

Not as Good as I Remembered It
When the "Sarah Conners Chronicles" began, my girlfriend became an ardent fan. Then I discovered she had never seen the Terminator movies, and thus didn't really understand how it all fit together. And I was, like, how did THAT happen? So we watched the SD copy of "The Terminator" I had in my library, and we liked it. It was fresh then, and it's still the one that started this whole big-budget sci-fi-action genre, and it made Schwarznegger a star. Then I bought "Terminator 2" in Blu-ray, because it was so cheap. But I found myself plum bored stiff by its antics. By the time that movie was made, anything Arnold was in was instantly an ARNOLD vehicle, and that was it's primary feature. Every scene would be written so Arnold can strike that cooler-than-thou pose, a shtick really, with his throwaway lines and disregard for destruction. Back then, like everyone else, I was caught up in the event of the movie itself. But even then, I wasn't comfortable with the extreme callousness presented at times as so cool. For example, it is NOT cool to blow an innocent person's knee out, and make it humorous with a guttural reminder of its strict compliance with John's earlier instructions that he not kill people. For some, that might appear cute, but really it demonstrates the shallowness of the story in that it relied on the good guy treating flesh-and-blood human beings like cartoon characters. It was silly and ultimately boring. It's not really GOOD science fiction. It's an ACTION movie.

As it turned out, the Blu-ray edition didn't really add much to an already lackluster experience. While it was a noisy movie, and it was peppered with lots of gunfire and explosions, there wasn't much to SAVOR visually; not like, say, Blade Runner [Blu-ray] or Gattaca [Blu-ray], sumptuous visual feasts you'll indulge again and again. Remove the cuteness and the action, and what's left really? In that last viewing, I realized that I had always felt this way about it, but the movie was just so aggressive, I dared not permit myself to fully think it. But I'm thinking it now.

To reiterate what others have said, it is indeed a stripped down affair. But considering my current ennui with this whole genre, it didn't matter to me.

So my Blu-ray library doesn't become as cluttered as my SD DVD library has become, I gave my copy away to my son.

WAIT! Don't. Buy. It. YET!
I purchased this Blu-ray recently and found it to be a waste of money. YES, TERMINATOR 2 is unspeakably awesome; YES, TERMINATOR 2 on Blu-ray is a good thing...BUT NOT THIS VERSION.

For one, it's THEATRICAL CUT ONLY!

Second, this version is EXTREMELY BARE BONES: it's just the movie and 2 commentary tracks (one from 1993, the other from 2003) and THAT'S IT. For a movie with so much technical precision and BTS material found on previous releases, this is a GRIEVOUS oversight.

Third (and final), the transfer is TERRIBLE. The original film is a bit grainy to begin with, but in previous VHS and DVD transfers it was never enough to be distracting. Here, in 1080 resolution, the grain is so bothersome that it strikes me more as digital noise--even STATIC at worst--than actual celluloid texture. I get the feeling they went through the HD transfer process as fast as possible to cash in on the HD market. It looks little better than what the old DVD version would on upconvert.

Interestingly, I recently bought THE ROAD WARRIOR on Blu-ray and noticed the difference. Both ROAD WARRIOR and TERMINATOR 2 have roughly the same amount of grain in their image (and the VHS and DVD transfers were comparable), but the Blu-ray transfer of THE ROAD WARRIOR is GLORIOUS, and the grain actually accentuates the image (worth every penny); logically, the TERMINATOR 2 image should be on par at LEAST, but instead it underperforms.

So don't buy this Blu-ray release of it yet, because if history is any teacher, TERMINATOR 2 is going to receive the same double and triple-dipping treatment it did on DVD, and the next release is likely to have a better transfer and bonus features...the same thing already happened with THE FIFTH ELEMENT.