SanDisk CF Type I/II ImageMate USB 2.0 Reader/Writer (Model SDDR-92-A15)
|
| List Price: | $33.99 |
| Price: | $15.95 |
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from and sold by Adorama Camera
22 new or used available from $13.99
Average customer review:Product Description
MX SD SDDR-92-A15 CF TYPE I/II READER/WRITER WITH TRANSFER BUTTON
Product Details
- Brand: SanDisk
- Model: SDDR-92-A15
- Dimensions: 2.40" h x .80" w x 3.20" l, 2.00 pounds
Features
- Reads and writes CompactFlash (CF) cards, Types I and II
- Hi-Speed USB 2.0-certified for fastest data transfer
- Backward-compatible with all USB 1.1 ports
- Saves batteries: let the ImageMate USB 2.0 reader/writer (not your portable device) transfer your files
- Windows XP and Mac OS 10.2 logo-compliant
Customer Reviews
does its job well
It reader/writer is easy and intuitive to use, decent transfer speed, and it does what it's supposed to do.
It just works
It works as advertised. No need to install any drivers under Windows XP. I was able to read from Microdrive and CF without any issues.
Does it really do that?
I purchased the SanDisk Reader/Writer assuming that it would help in placing pictures into Photoshop Elements. I had previously done this directly from my Camera successfully and thought the reader/writer would enhance my experience. I guess the main problem is that there is no clear instructions to follow.
When I placed the pictures on my computer using the SanDisk card reader the software placed them in a program created by SanDisk that I did not understand and could not get them into Photoshop Elements. I was under the mistaken impression that I could select individual pictures using the card reader and work on them in Photoshop but could not figure out how.
I am evidently missing something. My impression now is that it does not operate any better for me than using the cord from my camera.
Does the SanDisk card reader allow me to select individual pictures from my compact flash card? If I have to place all of the pictures on my computer then it is no better than hooking up my camera directly as I did before.
Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong -- or am I right in assuming this?








