The Architecture of Community
|
| List Price: | $40.00 |
| Price: | $34.20 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details |
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com
30 new or used available from $34.20
Average customer review:Product Description
Product Details
- Amazon Sales Rank: #57472 in Books
- Published on: 2009-05-08
- Released on: 2009-05-01
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Binding: Hardcover
- 496 pages
Features
- ISBN13: 9781597265782
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
- Click here to view our Condition Guide and Shipping Prices
Editorial Reviews
Review
"This book is Mr. Krier''s gift to the coming generations-who, otherwise, have been left saddled by us with little more than extravagant debts in every way you could imagine. They are going to have to inhabit what remains of this planet, along with whatever remains of its resources, when we are gone, and Mr. Krier''s heroic, often lonely labors, have produced this indispensable beacon of principle and methodology to light their way home." (James Howard Kunstler from the book's afterword )
"This is the compendium of common sense that has flowed from Leo''s pen for over forty years. From first to last, none of it has aged; and none of it will age. It is the one indispensable book on urbanism." (Andres Duany co-founder of the Congress for the New Urbanism )
"Long the inspiration of new urbanists, L�on Krier''s work, now comprehensively gathered in this book, is still the best guide for designing buildings and communities." (Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk co-founder of the Congress for the New Urbanism )
"More than ever Krier has every right to claim our attention. We need him, in fact, as never before. He presents us with the lessons, if we would but take them, that come out of rediscovery. He celebrates the values that are knowable." (Robert A.M. Stern from the book's foreword )
About the Author
Customer Reviews
The Timeless Way of Rebuilding
If your faith is in Modern architecture, then you will find much to disagree with in this book. But if your faith is in traditional vernacular and Classical architecture, you will find a breath of fresh air in this open plea for sanity!
In between a thoughtful Foreword by Robert A. M. Stern, and a blistering Last Word by James Howard Kunstler, Krier makes some very bold statements and unpopular judgments against Modernism. Yet he does so with the grandfatherly wisdom of a well-seasoned and well-traveled Architect and Planner. He makes a compelling case for the ultimate sustainability of Classical and vernacular design, in its timeless beauty and elegant purposefulness, which comes as much from a rigorous disciplined understanding of its principles as it does from a deep heartfelt concern for the wellness and wholeness of humanity. For those who intend to endure and prosper beyond the end of peak oil and the bankruptcy of Modernism, Krier's book will provide practical instruction in the time-tested yet elegantly simple solutions to rebuilding our environment and restoring our souls to the sublime qualities of harmony with nature and community with each other that the ancients enjoyed.
Book Review by Philip Langdon: The Architecture of Community
If you've never read Léon Krier, you've missed a tremendous pleasure. Krier, the Luxembourg-born architect who has sometimes been called the intellectual godfather of New Urbanism, may be the world's funniest living architectural theorist. He can be delightfully droll while making deadly serious points. For years his clever cartoons, especially, have alerted audiences to the ludicrousness of many contemporary architectural fashions.
Several years ago, Washington, DC, architect Dhiru Thadani realized that Krier's writings needed to be brought together, expanded or updated in some instances, and published as a single book. The joyful result is The Architecture of Community, a profusely illustrated volume that lays out Krier's thoughts on how buildings and communities should be designed and constructed.
I'm sure many critics regard Krier as an anachronism. He argues that there's no need for buildings to be more than a few stories high. He sees no point in pursuing the zeitgeist. The proper role of architecture, in Krier's view, is to uphold and strengthen the character of particular places, not chase after that modernist will o' the wisp, the "spirit of the age."
Born in 1946, Krier came by his love of tradition naturally. "I grew up in an environment that, despite two recent world wars, was unblemished by modernist architecture and planning," Krier remembers. "Until the mid-1960s, Luxembourg was a miracle of traditional architecture, a small capital city of 70,000 souls, embedded in manicured agricultural and horticultural landscapes and lofty beach [beech] forests. ... My father's tailoring workshop occupied the ground floor of the townhouse, and for my primary education I hopped across the street when hearing the school bells chime from our garden."
"My mother's piano playing filled the house, and during holidays my parents took us four children to Switzerland, France, and Italy to visit places of beauty." But he came upon modernist visions in books by Le Corbusier, Giedion, and Gropius. "The formidable promise expressed there had swollen my sails," he says. Thus, in the summer of 1963, he took his parents to see Le Corbusier's Cité Radieuse in Marseille. When, after enjoying beautifully intact old towns and landscapes nearby, the family encountered the "tawdry reality" of Corbu's creation, "we were all speechless with shock," Krier recalls. "Though I didn't realize it immediately, my life's orientation became defined by that visit."
In these pages Krier presents a philosophy of civilized and soul-nurturing settings -- through short, vivid sections of text, pithy cartoons, and lovely drawings. Occasional misspellings and foreign words and sometimes less than fully explained photos of his buildings only accentuate the sense that here is a product of genius.
From his close study of European settlements, Krier has concluded that communities can appropriately be organized through either of two geometric systems -- organic, irregular pattern-making, which Krier calls "vernacular networking," or artificially imposed straight lines, which Krier calls "classical networking." He sees organic planning as more practical and beneficial than is generally recognized. In Poundbury, a demonstration project for Prince Charles in southwest England, there are extremely irregular streets, which form convivial urban spaces and "induce spontaneously civilized behavior from car drivers -- without the help of ubiquitous traffic gadgetry," he points out.
Krier repeatedly returns to what he sees as the need for tradition -- in architecture, materials, town-building, and other realms. "Today," he says, "one truth is evident: without traditional landscapes, cities, and values our environment would be a nightmare on a global scale."
Modernists often complain about resistance from authorities or from a stodgy populace. "Modernity that augments daily comforts finds broad acceptance," Krier shoots back, citing the popularity of modern vehicles and machines. He rejects the idea that most people lack aesthetic appreciation. On the contrary, according to Krier, "humanity's aesthetic sense is as natural and universal a gift as the capacities of speech, motion, and reproduction."
He doesn't deny that many traditional-style buildings from recent decades have "the aura of the fake, the ersatz, the surrogate." He blames this failing at least partly on synthetic construction materials, and asserts that the situation is destined to improve, because those substances -- including plate glass, glues, nails, and steel-reinforced concretes -- depend on fossil fuels, which will in time become too expensive, leading us back to using "authentic" materials. If he's right, we're in for a wrenching transition.
Much as I admire Krier, I have never understood how a world rapidly heading toward a population of 7 billion can do without high-rises or fit a massive contemporary workforce into neighborhood-scale buildings. Nor do I see most Americans being eager to live in the tight little villages that Europe historically produced. To me, Krier's book is not entirely persuasive. But he gets many things right, and if our energy-profligate economy implodes, Krier's vision will look extraordinarily prescient.
Philip Langdon is the Senior Editor at New Urban News Publications
Loud and clear!
Léon Krier's stimulating and entertaining book, though maybe a tad repetitive, is very highly recommended and doubtlessly destined to become a classic.
In a series of short texts, the author adamantly communicates his neo-traditional point of view on urban development, explaining for instance the essential difference between modernity and modernism or how the Washington Mall should be urbanized and densified.
The book is vibrantly enlivened with his own plans and intricate drawings as well as abundant, witty and sometimes provocative cartoon-like sketches.
Not only is this great mind of urban planning a distinguished academic but he also designed various projects coherent with his principles, including the town of Poundbury on the Prince of Wales' estates.
Congruent with this perhaps, he is very confident in the clout of planners and does not seem very concerned with economic realities, even when they would tend to confirm his own positions. In that sense, the reader may find an apt complement in Christopher Leinberger's down-to-earth work: «The Option of Urbanism».



