Product Description

Super absorben Cleans without streaking 36 Count (3 packages of 12) value priced.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #361 in Single Detail Page Misc
• Brand: Swiffer
• Dimensions: 1.00 pounds

Features

• Super absorbent pads
• Cleans without streaking
• 36 count (3 packages of 12)
• Value Priced

Customer Reviews

Swiffer WetJet
Neatest thing since the paper towel;
Easy to use and works like a champ!

Very cool...

Great Item - but get dirty fas.
I love my swifter mop - but make no mistake - this thing is really no replacement for actually getting down on your hands and knees and using a damp towel and really cleaning. The problem with the swifter pads is that they fill up with dirt really fast and they aren't designed to be wrung out to wash out the dirt. You end up just pushing the dirt around on your floor when the pad gets dirty. If you don't want to get down and dirty - they are a good alternative.

Rip off but pads are okay
Since the wet jet doesn't last long with regular use who needs this size? Otherwise, I like the size but not the price at all. I can get (and I live in a very well off area)the same amount of pads for only $15 at kings my local grocery. I own wet Jet and pads but didn't get this size refill pack. I also live in a large house with a little over 10 rooms including the kitchen and bathrooms. Only 5 rooms are mostly carpeted and have used wet jet in all the rooms including the rooms with some rug coverage except for 2 which have wall to wall carpeting 1 of which is a bathroom. I also wet Jet hall ways so all floor types it is used on in my house. If you read the wet jet instructions it comes with these pads do what they claim except for scrubbing. The problem is they don't claim much therefore it is good mostly at just getting the unseen filth. Provided you don't use to little or to much cleaning fluid. Sometimes it can clean more then claimed which is a plus to. But you still have to vacuum sweep or both prior and or after use. If wet jet lasted longer and these were much cheaper I'd definantly get these but since that isn't true don't bother.