Product Description

When Confederate troops surrendered Vicksburg on July 4, 1863--the day after the Union victory at Gettysburg--a crucial port and rail depot for the South was lost. The Union gained control of the Mississippi River, and the Confederate territory was split in two. In a thorough yet concise study of the longest single military campaign of the Civil War, Michael B. Ballard brings new depth to our understanding of the Vicksburg campaign by considering its human as well as its military aspects.

Ballard examines soldier attitudes, guerrilla warfare, and the effects of the campaign and siege on civilians in and around Vicksburg. He also analyzes the leadership and interaction of such key figures as U.S. Grant, William T. Sherman, John Pemberton, and Joseph E. Johnston, among others. Blending strategy and tactics with the human element, Ballard reminds us that while Gettysburg has become the focal point of the history and memory of the Civil War, the outcome at Vicksburg was met with as much celebration and relief in the North as was the Gettysburg victory, and he argues that it should be viewed as equally important today.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #272998 in Books
• Published on: 2004-10-25
• Released on: 2003-10-31
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Binding: Hardcover
• 576 pages

Review
"Ballard is one of the few historians who can truly claim mastery of the complexities that make the Vicksburg campaign so daunting a study." - Civil War Book Review"

Review
"Thanks to the depth of Ballard's research . . . even those closely acquainted with the campaign will find many small epiphanies, while those new to it will be in the hands of a trustworthy guide. . . . The best account of the Vicksburg campaign we have."
— American Historical Review

"A readable and informative examination of the operations taken to defend the city of Vicksburg. . . . A welcome addition to the literature of the campaign that sheds further light on the all-important and decisive Western theater in the Civil War."
— The Historian

"Provides a great deal of new perspective. . . . Proffers . . . the most positive and in-depth evaluation of Grant's canal and bayou projects ever presented."
— Register of Kentucky Historical Society

"An extremely useful summary of the campaign that succeeds in setting it in the wider context of the war itself. Future campaign studies would do well to follow this example."
— Journal of Southern History

From the Inside Flap
Ballard provides a concise yet thorough study of the 1863 battle that cut off a crucial port and rail depot for the South and split Confederate territory, providing a turning point in the Civil War. He argues that the Union victory at Vicksburg was met with as much celebration in the North as the Gettysburg victory and should be viewed as equally important today.

Customer Reviews

To Open The Mississippi

The Vicksburg seige campaign of 1862-1863 has had a few good books written on it, one for instance being Edwin Bearss 3 volumes. But for the general reader desiring only one volume, this latest one from Civil War America, Gary Gallagher editor, from Chapel Hill should be a welcome issue.

The author certainly has credentials. The campaign has been of interest to him since his first trip to the battlefield from his childhood home in north-central Mississippi. He still looks forward to each visit yet today to the "Gibraltar of the Confederacy." And when one marries his wife on Fort Hill, it is safe to say Vicksburg runs through this man's entire being.

Battles and campaigns of the Western Theater of Operations can yet today receive little notice from even the most serious reader of the civil war. It sometimes seems the only army in the field was the Army of the Potomac. And with a new book by Jeffry D. Wert soon to arrive on "Lincoln's Sword," the books keep rolling out. And when thinks of the attention Gettysburg has received, one must think in the 1000s where Gettysburg books are concerned.

Yet most readers know that the area of the Army of the Potomac was not the sole area of combat involved. And recently we have been given some very good works on the Western Theater. Such books as the recent "Days of Glory" by Larry J. Daniel, "That Body of Brave Men" by Mark W. Johnson, and the earlier two volume work, "Army of the Heartland" by Thomas Lawrence Connelly, are only three that grace my civil war bookshelf. And it is to be remembered that U.S. Grant too came from this very area. Though some may have questions of General Grant, it does seem a fact that under his generalship the Army of the Potomac began to win battles.

A prevailing feeling today is that neither North nor South may have seen Gettysburg to have the importance we now place on it. Southern newspapers of the time did not view it necessarily as the end of the war. Neither did the North. Yet each area realized immediately just what value Vicksburg held, and what an extreme cost it was for the South to have lost control of the Mississippi. And Ben Butler is still reviled in that area today!

Being from Ohio, I have great interest in movement of the OVI and Ohio cavalry units, and that places my reading quite often in this Western Theatre. There are many things of interest in this book. Even the seasoned reader will find enjoyment here.

And though the Vicksburg campaign ended, many of the southern men fought on. Though they were paroled after surrender at Vicksburg, many were later at Chattanooga to face General Grant once again!

Semper Fi.

an informative account of the vicksburg campaign
Ballard has written an informative account of the Vicksburg campaign and believes that the Union won through superior generalship and naval power. According to Ballard Grant and his subordinates acted as a team while the Confederate side was hindered by constant infighting between Johnston and Pemberton. Moreover,Pemberton was unable to react to Grant's moves, but Grant was looking for new innovative moves to distract and outflank the Confederates. Naval power also played a key role in helping Grant transport troops and block reinforcements from entering Vicksburg. The only drawback to this book is that Ballard doesn't mention new research by Terrence Winschel,Timothy Smith, and others in his book. Otherwise this book is destined to be a classic account of the Vicksburg campaign.

Good Book for the Libary of a Civil War Buff
This is a good book for anyone interested in studying on the Civil War. As the author mentions, this campaign to capture Vicksburg is a rather unknown period of the war and this is a good book on this campaign. It has its plusses and its minuses. On the positive side, it covers the campaign in detail with a number of human interest stories. The experiences of the citizens and soldiers who lived in Vicksburg, e.g. living in caves, the casualties, the experiences of soldiers in the hospitals (for example, he goes through the procedure that a doctor used to remove a leg - interesting although somewhat gruesome but it highlights the suffering). He is an apparent fan of Pemberton (although he recognizes his mistakes well) and not a fan of Joe Johnston (but I haven't found a Civil War writer who is...). He covers them well and also the top Union generals: Grant, Sherman and McClernand, including Grant's supposed bouts with alcohol and the feud between McClernand and Grant. This is a balanced coverage. On the minuses side, I found myself getting confused at times about what was really happening. For example, the coverage of the battles including the maps which are very confusing, which ramble about this unit and that unit going this way and that. The early book with this Confederate general and that Confederate general doing this and that is also confusing and may cause you to get you to get frustrated with the book, but stick with it. At one point, he has Pemberton in Vicksburg and needing to go to Vicksburg in the same paragraph. So, I read it again, and... huh. But then the story picks up when Grant tries one approach versus another to reach Vicksburg and decides on approaching it from the South. This is very interesting showing the chess moves between Grant, Pemberton and Johnston which Grant ultimately won. This is a good book, on a period that should be covered more. It may be confusing because unlike Gettysburg, where each writer can read the other books and build on them, there are few sources. So, I recommend it.