Product Description

As the Internet diffuses across the globe, many have come to believe that the technology poses an insurmountable threat to authoritarian rule. Grounded in the Internet's early libertarian culture and predicated on anecdotes pulled from diverse political climates, this conventional wisdom has informed the views of policy makers, business leaders, and media pundits alike. Yet few studies have sought to systematically analyze the exact ways in which Internet use may lay the basis for political change.

In Open Networks, Closed Regimes, the authors take a comprehensive look at how a broad range of societal and political actors in eight authoritarian and semi-authoritarian countries employ the Internet. Based on methodical assessment of evidence from these cases—China, Cuba, Singapore, Vietnam, Burma, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt—the study contends that the Internet is not necessarily a threat to authoritarian regimes.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #938404 in Books
• Published on: 2003-01-01
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Binding: Paperback
• 218 pages

Review
"...fascinating and extremely useful." -- The Washington Monthly

"...provides a timely, welcome and overdue counter to simplistic claims for the politically liberating effects of the Internet." -- Survival

"An important guide to scholars and policymakers concerned with understanding the conditions under which the Internet may foster democratic change." -- Larry Diamond, Hoover Institution, Stanford University

"Must reading for anyone interested in learning from evidence, rather than widely accepted assumptions, how influence of Internet is used." -- The ZGram

"Their research is solid, their analysis stimulating, and their findings should make us pause, rethink, and refocus." -- David Ronfeldt, coauthor of Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy

About the Author
Shanthi Kalathil is an associate in the Information Revolution and World Politics Project at the Carnegie Endowment. Previously, she was a Hong Kong-based staff reporter for The Asian Wall Street Journal. She has written extensively on the political impact of the information revolution in developing countries.

Taylor C. Boas is pursuing a Ph.D. in political science at the University of California, Berkeley.

Customer Reviews

Good Book, Difficult Read
If you are interested in this subject, it is certainly a book that you want to read. It provides an excellent analysis of the situation. In the `90's the irrational exuberance of the economic potential of the Internet created the dot-com bubble. There is also an inflated perception on what the Internet means socially, a condition that still exists. This book is a pin that pops that bubble.

One warning, this book is not a page-turner. At times the way in which the authors deliver the information is somewhat dry. This made the book difficult to read at times. This is not to suggest a fault, you just need to be prepared for what you are about to read.

If you are looking for a fun filled read, this is not the book for you. If you are looking for a book that delivers factual information and insights on the implications of the Internet on closed regimes, then this should definitely be part of your library.

a disturbing possibility
This was an important book for me because it made me realize that national governments can separate economic freedom from political freedom and that national governments could encourage the former while also discouraging the latter. The book looks at the use of the internet in and by eight semi-authoritarian and authoritarian nations. One conclusion that can be reached is that such governments can be adept in their use of the Internet. A more complete review of the book can be found on the Resource Center for Cyberspace Studies web page for book reviews.