Product Description

Even before John D. MacDonald first anchored Travis McGee’s houseboat, the Busted Flush, at Fort Lau-derdale’s Bahia Mar Marina, Florida had developed a rich legacy of fictional detectives. Since McGee, the state has become the home of perhaps the greatest number and variety of mystery writers in America.

From Elmore Leonard’s professional hoods to Carl Hiaasen’s amateur grotesques, Florida’s mystery writers have created a criminal universe that centers on Miami but stretches from the Key West of James Hall and Laurence Shames through the Palm Beach of Lawrence Sanders and the Orlando of John Lutz to the panhandle of Geoffrey Norman. This is a world of sophisticated Latina journalists like Edna Buchanan’s Britt Montero and retiring ichthyologists like Randy Wayne White’s Doc Ford, of Armani-clad socialites like Ed McBain’s Matthew Hope and leisure-suited cops like Charles Willeford’s Hope Moseley.

For the first time, a group of literary critics examines how the center of crime shifted from the City of Angels to the home of Miami Vice and the Magic Kingdom and why the country’s southernmost state has developed such a concentration of talented mystery writers. In addition to essays on the origins of the detective novel in Florida and its contemporary masters, the book includes a chapter on Florida film noir from Key Largo to Body Heat and the first comprehensive bibliography of mysteries set in the state.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #2487448 in Books
• Published on: 1997-06-15
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Binding: Paperback
• 192 pages

About the Author
Steve Glassman teaches humanities at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He is author of Blood on the Moon: A Novel of Old Florida, and an editor of Zora in Florida.

Maurice O’Sullivan, professor of English at Rollins College, is coeditor of the Florida Reader, Florida Poetry, and The Emergence of Modern Amer-ica; he is editor of Shakespeare’s Other Lives.

Customer Reviews

New info on noir
I enjoyed this book. Very informative and as a lover of noir, discovered some lovely nuggets of unknown information. Glassman and O'Sullivan make this book both interesting as well as intriguing.

Decent Resource for Florida Crime Fiction, but the Essays Lack Depth.
"Florida Noir: Crime Fiction & Film in the Sunshine State" should come with a couple of caveats: The fiction discussed herein is not all "noir" or hard-boiled. The editors admit to using "the broadest possible definition of noir", meaning all crime fiction. This is a book about crime fiction set in Florida. Secondly, there is only one essay about film noir, and it's not worth mentioning. It briefly discusses some films that aren't noir before getting to 1980's "Body Heat". The author of that essay, Ellen Smith, clearly doesn't have much background in film and doesn't even mention "Miami Vice", which surprisingly made pastels the `80s noir aesthetic.

There are 11 essays by 10 writers, including editors Steve Glassman and Maurice O'Sullivan. Ten essays address a variety of topics in Florida crime fiction: the California origins of hard-boiled fiction and its move south, comparing author John D. MacDonald to his character Travis McGee, Florida crime fiction before 1945, the grotesque in the novels of Charles Willeford and Carl Hiassen, the women detectives of TJ MacGugor and Edna Buchanan, novels set in the Florida Keys, nature and ecology in Florida crime fiction, the fairy-tale inspired work of Ed McBain, and crime novels set in North Florida.

This is an interesting resource for Floridians who enjoy crime fiction, as it discusses writers from the early 20th century through the 1990s. The essays are academic but not abstruse or very ideological, so they are not dense. For literary criticism, it's lightweight, but that makes it a readable resource for crime fiction fans. There is also a "Bibliography of Florida Mysteries, 1895-1996" in the back, listed alphabetically by author. "Florida Noir" is a decent introduction to the sub-genre of Florida crime fiction. I give it only 3 stars, because I kept getting the feeling that the authors of those essays could have done better. It's hardly rigorous.