Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #267389 in Books
• Published on: 1987-01
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Binding: Paperback

From Library Journal
This memoir is a bitter review of Stockman's years in the Reagan Administration. It is a book with few heroes and many fools. The author claims naivete as his excuse. Although the narrative is somewhat confusing, overall, its backstage view of policymaking leaves one discouraged, even frightened by the superficiality. The book is a necessary library purchase for two reasons: the notoriety of the book and its author, and the insider's view of key policies still in place and key personalities still in power. Richard C. Schiming, Economics Dept., Mankato State Univ., Minn.
Copyright 1986 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Customer Reviews

Stockman's book explains the reason for our national debt.
David Stockman, the former head of the OMB (1980-1986), does an outstanding job of explaining the government's inability to control the explosive growth in national debt levels. In Stockman's memoirs there are no heroes or villians, just varying gradations of politicians dedicated to "bringing home the bacon" to their districts while piously proclaiming their allegiance to balancing the budget and restoring fiscal sanity to the political process. Republicans are portrayed as replicas of their Democratic counterparts, equally adept at seizing national assets for their paymasters. Perhaps Stockman's greatest sin, in the eyes of his former conservative comrades, was his depiction of Ronald Reagan as an old, harmless softy whose refusal to demand discipline from his staff, party, and the American people helped contribute to the deficit chaos that ensued during his tenure.

A classic of 20th century American politics
It's unfortunate that a couple of my fellow reviewers let their partisan ire blind them to the valuable lessons in national fiscal policy in this book. Stockman's basic thesis is that the supply-side revolution had three main components:(1) a large tax cut package, (2) "painful" spending cuts, and (3) a hard-money monetary policy. Stockman makes a very persuasive argument that the Reagan Administration was unwilling to soften hard-line stance on the tax cut when it was obvious that (2) was not being taken care of and (3) was inconsistent with this policy. Even when the dangers of this course became clear, the Administration shut its eyes to reality and hoped for the best.

Contrary to the reviewer below, I don't think Stockman argues that the Laffer curve was "discredited" in an intellectual sense, but rather that it was only applicable in an inflationary economy; Paul Volcker's tightening actions at the Federal Reserve denied this crucial condition. As to the reviewer with the childish "liberal propaganda" claim, Stockman clearly makes the point that Republicans and Democrats alike were unwilling to make the drastic spending cuts needed to offset the revenue loss. (And regardless of your political affiliation, I'm not sure how you can defend the economic wisdom of a president who doesn't understand such rudimentary concepts as the difference between current and constant dollars). And as to the idea that Rosy Scenario wasn't all that important, how else would you explain that the mounting debt feared by Stockman actually materialized? Say what you will, Stockman's predictions turned out to be right. It would be wrong to characterize Stockman's book as an attack on Republicans, or supply-side economics per se. It is rather a warning to would-be ideologues who would attempt to impose their dreams on an uncooperative world, a lesson that both liberals and conservatives should take to heart.

American Political Analysis at its Best
To discover the subject matter of this book, you can look to other reviews. I will confine my comments to my own opinion, for what it's worth.

I have read this book several times, now randomly picking pages for a starting point. No other book comes close to understanding America's domestic political process. It is an intelligent view from the trenches, like Robert Graves' "Goodbye to All That".

A reader must understand that Stockman writes with a quick, wry sense of humour. He's beyond tongue in cheek. It could be titled "The Education of David Stockman". The content is fascinating (the right should take notice), but so is the style (the left has to marvel)!

This one is an esoteric classic - better than 'Six Crises'.