I read this book for my 19th Century Women's Lit and it was definitely not one of my favorites. It was really hard to get into and I didn't relate to it very well.

Definitely not Mrs. Dalloway, but I enjoy reading Woolf for the most part; it's always fun to try and figure out what she was really thinking when she wrote her novels and what she was trying to get across.

I hated this book. The only reason I read the entire thing was because I had to read it for my Modern Lit class, but I never got into it and the plot line wasn't interesting to me at all.

I read this for the second time for my Modern Lit class and I really just didn't enjoy the book. The satire is decent, but for all the hype this novel gets, I guess I just don't "get" it.

I liked this novel and I generally enjoy Roth's writing, but I think it was a little difficult to get into. The ending was interesting, but the beginning was kind of slow for me.

I read this book a few years ago for fun, but had to read it again this year for my Modern Lit class. I got a lot more out of it the second time around, but I enjoyed it both times through.

I hated this book. It was hard to get into the plot and it was hard to follow the plot as well.

I read this book in just a few hours and I adored it. While the plot was very... weird, for lack of a better word, the novel on a whole is a good read and really makes you think about the repurcussions of things that you say/do to others.

I really enjoyed this book, but the whole "mystery" part at the end was kind of lame.

My favorite book that I had to read for my Fiction class. It read like I was watching it play out on film and remained interesting throughout the book. I don't usually watch old films, so I got a little confused with all of the references, but it was cool trying to figure out what movie Erickson was referring to in each part of the book and how the Manson murders locked the book in time.

This was the second time I had to read this book and I still hate it.

Definitely the best non-fiction book I've ever read. It read like I was reading a murder mystery and it's filled with so many interesting facts. I loved it.

Not exactly "Catcher in the Rye." I didn't really get into this book.

I'm a Psychology majoy... what can I say? But it was actually kind of interesting and somewhat accurate I thought.

I now love Paul Auster. All three of the novels were written as separate mysteries, and I definitely wasn't expecting the twist at the end.

I have conflicting emotions about this book. I think I wanted to like it more than I actually did like it, but I just didn't really like it.