Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #2404598 in Books
• Published on: 2003-09
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Binding: Paperback
• 224 pages

Customer Reviews

STEER CLEAR OF THIS BOOK
I hardly know where to begin with this book. For one thing, Dr. Slonecker is EXTREMELY control-oriented throughout this book...in fact, he is almost obssessive about it. One begins to wonder if Dr. Slonecker has got a personal hangup and needs help in this area. For another, several examples he uses and recommends in this book as positive and correct discipline methods are downright abusive. Just a couple of examples: how about pouring ice on a hospitalized child? she still won't do what you want her to do? how about packing her bed with ice and refusing to remove it as punishment for her so-called defiance? or how about making a child go home naked from a dentist's office simply because he threatened to remove his clothes if he didn't get his way? or how about praising parents who humiliate their children by spanking them in front of other people when they misbehave? or how about Dr. Slonecker's version of the Golden Rule--"He who has the gold, makes the rules"? Another point of interest, Dr. Slonecker vehemently defends circumcision, stating that uncircumcised boys have a "slight" increase in reproductive cancers. But, when it comes to breastfeeding versus bottlefeeding, Dr. Slonecker refuses to endorse breastfeeding as the better choice, despite the volumes and volumes and volumes of studies done over SEVERAL decades that show HUGE health risks for infants who are fed artificial milk (including a much higher risk for diabetes, a higher rate of illness and hospitalization, a higher rate for a number of gastrointestinal disorders, and a greater risk for a number of cancers). Given this evidence, does it make sense that he would vehemently defend circumcision and not breastfeeding? To top it off, he recommends the most incredibly ridiculous feeding schedule that would NEVER work with breastfeeding. Of course, he touts this feeding schedule as a spiritually superior method of feeding, but completely ignores that the method is TOTALLY incompatible with the God-designed way of comforting, bonding with, and feeding an infant--breastfeeding. And the best part of his infant feeding program? Solids at two weeks of age! That's right!! Solid foods for an infant of only 2 weeks. Never mind that his recommendations are COMPLETELY against the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines and COMPLETELY against ALL current medical knowledge to date, but his recommendations have also been linked over and over again with breastfeeding failure, gastrointestinal problems, and failure to thrive in infants AND with obesity, diabetes, and high blood pressure in later life. This man is practicing right out of the 1940s, and parents could do MUCH better with another book. Besides his ridiculous advice, he uses strong overtones of religious intimidation to bully a parent (particularly a new, vulnerable, and uneducated one) into thinking they must follow Dr. Slonecker's regimen in order to be a good Christian parent. Christian parents everywhere...TAKE NOTE! You can do MUCH better than this book. Save yourself the misery of a failed breastfeeding relationship with your child and the misery of making everything in your relationship with your child a battle of wills. There are better Christian authors. Check out Dr. Kevin Leman, Dr. William Sears, or Dr. Ross Campbell instead, godly men who actually understand children and understand the REAL Golden Rule ("do unto others as you would have done unto yourself"). Put plainly, Dr. William Slonecker learned his way about half a century ago and figured he knew it all at that point and didn't figure there was anything else he needed to learn. Clearly, he has been closed to learning and growing throughout his entire time as a pediatrician...and now he wants to drag you down with him!

Stay Away
I am horrified that respected Christian publisher Broadman & Holman has published this book. Clearly they did not do adequate medical review before doing so, or they would have realized how significantly the pediatrician author's advice departs from the standards of his own professional organization, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

The feeding advice in the book regarding breastfeeding, formula feeding, and starting solids directly contradicts the AAP recommendations. It is likely to contribute significantly to the failure of breastfeeding, to food allergies, and possibly even to low weight gain or failure to thrive.

The discipline advice is equally troubling. As a Christian, I am grieved by the harsh, hyper-controlling attitude Dr. Slonecker advocates. Yes, God expects obedience and so should Christian (and nonChristian) parents. But Dr. Slonecker is not mirroring God's approach by focusing on parental power, rather than nurture.

Further, some of his stories, presumably from years ago during his practice, today would constitute legally actionable child abuse in most communities. A dentist not only remaining alone in an exam room with a child who has stripped naked, but then forcing that child to walk naked through the outer office and parking lot? This, plus the story of packing a defiant ill child in ice to teach her who was in charge is nothing more than the legally questionable exercise of raw power, not real training in healthy attitudes toward authority.

Stay away from this book. The author may be a pediatrician (now retired, I believe), but he is seriously out of step with current medical knowledge and with generally accepted Christian standards from other respected parenting authors like Dr. Kevin Leman, Dr. Ross Campbell, and Drs. Henry Cloud and John Townsend.

conservative Christian
I would like to address the last reviewer who states that anyone who objects to Slonecker is a "Howard Deanesque left-winger who wouldn't know Jesus if He walked in through the front door."

I am a VERY conservative Christian...my family and I adhere to EXTREMELY conservative views...much more conservative views than even the average Christian. (Just one example, I wear a headcovering to show my submissiveness as a wife.) I have known the Lord personally and intimately for 16 years.

It is precisely because of my extremely conservative views that I find fault with Slonecker's poor exegesis of Scripture and terribly poor advice for parenting infants and children. Put simply, his advice is not "the old way" as is often espoused. It is a way that came into vogue within the last 100 years or so. This was NOT the way Jesus was raised---treating children this way was simply not done in His culture.

Experts tell us that Jewish mothers of the Bible breastfed for at least 2-3 years (see I Samuel 1:21-23), co-slept with their families (see Jesus' parable in Luke 11:5-7), breastfed when the baby indicated a hunger or comfort need rather than on a schedule (see Isaiah 66:10-13), and did not immediately give solid foods to infants (see Hebrews 5:12-14).

And we know that the TRUE older way of the Scriptures is best, as is evidenced by the mounds and mounds of scientific research today that shows the benefit of God's older and more natural way and the outright health risks and harms of man's (i.e., Slonecker's) new and improved way.

For a better and more Scripturally sound way of raising children, conservative Christian readers will find a haven and encouragement in books written by such conservative authors as Dr. Ross Campbell (How To Really Love Your Child, Relational Parenting), Dr. and Mrs. William Sears (The Baby Book, The Discipline Book, The Complete Book of Christian Parenting and Child Care), Dr. Brenda Hunter (Home By Choice, The Power of Motherlove), and Clay and Sally Clarkson (Heartfelt Discipline, The Mission of Motherhood).

I hope new and vulnerable parents will see through the harmful and unnatural techniques of Slonecker and will seek their advice elsewhere. That is my sincere prayer.