Product Description

From Pierre de Fermat to Samuel Taylor Coleridge to Graham Greene, readers have related to books through the notes they write in the margins. In this pioneering book—the first to examine the phenomenon of marginalia—H.J. Jackson surveys an extraordinary range of annotated books to explore the history of marginalia, the forms they take, the psychology that underlies them, and the reactions they provoke.

Based on a study of thousands of books annotated by readers both famous and obscure over the last three centuries, this book reveals the intensity of emotion that characterizes the process of reading. For hundreds of years, readers have talked to other people in the margins of their books—not only to authors, but also to friends, lovers, and future generations.

With an infectious enthusiasm for her subject, Jackson reflects on the cultural and historical value of writing in the margins, examines works that have invited passionate annotation, and presents examples of some of the most provocative marginalia. Imaginative, amusing, and poignant, this book will be treasured by—and maybe even annotated by—anyone who cares about reading.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #48688 in eBooks
• Published on: 2001-02-08
• Format: Kindle Book
• Number of items: 1

From Publishers Weekly
It's difficult to imagine a scholarly enterprise easier to mock than a study of marginalia, the marks left behind by readers making their way through a text. Few readers pause to consider, let alone scrutinize, these bookish graffiti. Still, it is hard not to feel an affectionate regard for Jackson, a professor of English at the University of Toronto, laboring through hundreds of marked-up copies of Boswell's Life of Johnson and earnestly proposing a poetics of marginalia, with its own ethics and standards of practice and its own fusty acronyms (e.g., BEPU, or "Book Enhanced for Personal Use"). She brings to life, insofar as it is possible, the war between marginalia's practitioners and prohibitionists, the "annotators" vs. the "bibliophiles" ("anarchists," as Jackson neatly puts it, vs. "bores"): Wordsworth, for example, enraged his friend De Quincey by cutting open the pages of a new book with a butter-smeared knife. It's fair to say this book is most absorbing in its examples, such as the famous case of Fermat's last theorem (Fermat declared the margin of his book too small to contain the proof, leaving generations of mathematicians to wish they had been on hand with a Post-It). (Mar.) Forecast: Though rather dry, this unique title holds obvious appeal for bibliophiles, book historians, librarians, publishing folk and garden-variety obsessives. The key to its success will be targeted marketing in book-related magazines and handselling by booksellers, the latter a likely proposition.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal
Marginalia, which generally refers to handwritten or printed text located in the margins of a page, have been around practically as long as there have been margins to write in. Nowadays, people have mixed or strong feelings about writing in a book and often don't understand why some readers do it; libraries, of course, do not encourage patrons to annotate their materials. These doubts shift, however, when marginalia are associated with a historic or a public figure. Jackson (English, Univ. of Toronto) believes that whether the physical annotation of volumes destroys or adds value to books, notes are a common but "unexamined" phenomenon worth studying from literary, psychological, and cultural angles. Jackson examines more than 2000 books in public and academic libraries, focusing on the behavior of English-speaking annotators during the last three centuries. She emphasizes examples of original readers' notes from the 18th and 19th centuries, a period when writing developed rapidly and became highly refined. Prominently featured is Samuel Taylor Coleridge, an annotator himself and the pioneering figure of marginalia in English. Jackson includes ample examples from works of fiction and poetry to demonstrate readers' attitudes and explores the physical features of the annotated book. She also covers the history of annotation, possible motives, extreme reader's behavior, and the "dark side" of the annotating habit. This fascinating study is recommended for literary collections. Ali Houissa, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Review
"A lucid and lively foray into the history of reading." -- Anthony Grafton, author of The Footnote

"A strong argument for marginalia as the most tangible reminders of how deeply books leave their imprint on us. -- Scott McLemee, Lingua Franca

"An utterly fascinating blend of evidence and implication; we take away an almost visceral appreciation of the dynamics of reading." -- Sven Birkerts

"Curiously illuminating. . . . clearly the major text on this minor subject." -- Melvin Jules Bukiet, Los Angeles Times Book Review

"[A] splendid book." -- Harold Bloom, Brill's Content

[A] delectable book; [Jackson] reveals. . . the ability to be surprised and delighted;. . . she conveys that delight with clarity and wit. -- Frederic Koeppel, Commercial Appeal

Customer Reviews

Responding to the texts- in the margins
Most of us can recall (with shame, fear, or both) the warnings of parents and teachers regarding writing in the margins of books. Cute childish scribbles, elaborate adolescent doodles - or one's cleverest penciled responses to one text or another - provoked the same horrified response from the librarian. Dr. H.J. Jackson asserts and then asks, "Of course children should be taught not to write in other people's books; but why should they be denied the outlet of writing in their own?"

"Annotation," known by your grade school teacher as "ruining your books," has a long and colorful history. Erasmus recommended to his students that they write in their texts. In England, Coleridge was revered in his day as now for his prolific commentaries and, according to Jackson, "his name associated with the publication and popularization of the genre." At one point English children were taught how, specifically, to best annotate their books. Importantly, annotation was finally seen in a positive light, as a way to read actively: "a discipline that fosters attentive reading, intellectual self-awareness, and incisive writing."

Dr. Jackson's tour of marginalia's most ardent and consistent practitioners reads like a "Who's Who" of English-speaking literary history: Sir James Frazer, Boswell, Johnson, Hester Lynch Piozzi, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Alexander Pope, Virginia Woolf, John Ruskin, William Blake, Ellen Terry, T.H. White, Gertrude Stein, Northrup Frye, Vladimir Nabokov - and many more. In addition, much good annotation was done by readers whose names have been lost. There are hilarious anecdotes and quotes as well as perceptive character sketches. Jackson loves her subject and her cast of characters - and includes many interesting and amusing stories about the lives of the annotators. (In one anecdote Maurice Sendak, at a book signing, is warned by a panicked child not to wreck his new book - by autographing it. Sendak complies with the child's wishes.)

In addition Dr Jackson discusses North American and British museum and library collections of annotated books. There are novels, nonfiction, family bibles, college textbooks, cookbooks, and children's books in addition to classic and obscure texts.

Dr. Jackson is passionate about her subject. She's been at it for years. Addressing the arguments against its practice. She includes a thoughtful essay "Book Use or Book Abuse." There are hundreds of endnotes, a Bibliography of Annotated Books Cited, a Bibliography of Secondary Works Cited, and a good index.

This thrilling and careful study is by turns English literary history, the history of books and reading, trenchant psychological exploration, and biography. In addition, there is mystery, gossip, and fun. This is a wonderful book on a subject I'd never given much thought to, not realizing that writing in the margins has a glorious past - and having felt vaguely guilty for years for penciling so many of my books.

Definitely worth reading.

a good introduction to a neglected phenomenon
For years I was horrified at the thought of writing in books, even my own. I wanted to keep them clean and beautiful. Even after I went to university and started highlighting textbooks I made the distinction between a necessary utilitarian marking and my other books that I wanted to keep pristine.

But then something wonderful happened. I read a book that changed my life and I couldn't stop writing in it. I underlined. I took notes in the margins. I wrote sideways when I ran out of room, and jotted my own ideas on the bottoms of the pages, finally resorting to filling up the blank endpages. That experience changed my whole philosophy. Since then I not only write in (my own) books when the spirit moves me, but I look for others' notes when I buy used books as well. One of the most interesting books I have is by Eric Hoffer, the 'Longshoreman Philosopher', with notes written in it by at least three people besides myself. I love that.

Dr. Jackson addresses this heretofore neglected topic in terms of the physical (where it is placed), the historical (how attitudes about, and the function of, marginalia have changed), and the motivational (why people have left these traces). The author uses six lengthy case studies to illustrate her ideas, particularly drawing on the influence of Samuel Coleridge and Boswell's Life of Johnson. There are extensive notes, bibliographies of primary and secondary sources, and an index.

The writing is a bit dry, but the work is informative and interesting. The author really shines when she relates anecdotes, and I wish there would have been more of them as well as more illustrations --with only nine examples shown, I was really anxious to see more. I learned a lot about an interesting subject and am grateful to the author.

As a librarian, I don't advocate the marking of books that are for public use, but I am a firm believer in making one's books one's own -- and you can bet I marked this one up a bit.

An Interesting Subject
Marginalia--writing in the margins of books--is probably as old as the printed book itself (and even finds its way into manuscript books). Some people love to scribble in books. Of course, there are those who are stridently against it. Jackson, in the first attempt at a coherent view of the subject that I've seen, tries to show that there can be value in peoples reaction to the printed word in the context of marginalia as opposed to other methods (such as taking notes, etc.).

I just wish Jackson's book had been more coherent. I have no arguement with many of the points Jackson is trying to make. I find myself, as someone who "creates" marginalia in some of my books, reflected in many things she says. I, too, generally on write in books of non-fiction on subjects in which I feel I have some knowledge. I, too, as a book collector, came to writing marginalia late and still make it a point to keep many of my books in pristine condition because of that. Jackson obviously has a well-researched view of her subject.

On the other hand, I was somewhat disappointed in her skills as a writer. There is an incoherence to some of the things that she does in this book. She has nice coverage of different types of marginalia and speculates on some of the reasons that people write marginalia which are nicely done, but she includes discussions and digressions on book alterations that she even admits are technically not marginalia.

Also, she spends a lot of time in her last chapter considering whether writing marginalia in books is "right" or "wrong" when it clearly is not either. It is simply a matter of personal choice. I write marginalia in my books because I want to, the books are mine and I have no intention of getting rid of my books. On the other hand, I almost never buy books that already have marginalia in them. I want a pristine page for my own comments. Am I damaging my books or reducing their value? That depends on some future buyer and is not something I consider. I am increasing their value to myself. Perhaps my marginalia will have an interest to some future scholar. Perhaps my books will end up in the trash bin. But I won't be around to see it and I certainly don't feel there is any right or wrong to it.

What makes more sense is Jackson's arguement that books with marginalia should be better catalogued and more valued in scholarship. I do believe there are things to learn from marginalia for history in general and the history of reading, a subject which is becoming more popular these days.

This is a good book to read for anyone interested in books or the history of reading. If there were a number of books out there on this subject I would probably have rated this book lower because I don't find it particularly well-written. I would also suggest that people read Boswell's Life of Johnson before they read this because she spends a lot of time talking about this book. However, I have given this book some extra-credit for being a good first attempt that will hopefully generate more interest and better scholarship in the subject.