Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #11 in DVD
• Brand: Warner Brothers
• Released on: 2009-12-08
• Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
• Formats: Color, Limited Edition, Special Edition, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
• Original language: English
• Number of discs: 2
• Running time: 153 minutes

Features

• HARRY POTTER & THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE SE (DVD MOVIE)

Customer Reviews

dvd details
Since I had to look elsewhere for DVD details (to decide whether to buy the 2-disc or one-disc film), I thought I'd post here:

1-Disc Wide screen and Full Screen DVD


*Includes both a wide screen and full screen version of the film.
*No special features
*RRP $28.98
2-Disc Digital Copy Special Edition DVD


*Widescreen version only
*Additional scenes (6:31)
*Close-Up with the Cast and Crew of Harry Potter special. Matthew Lewis ("Neville Longbottom") and Alfred Enoch ("Dean Thomas") lead us on an entertaining look at the cast of Harry Potter as they explore their interests away from acting and spend a day on set with the production team (28:30)
*J.K. Rowling: A Year in the Life: A fascinating and intimate look into the life of J.K. Rowling over the last year of writing "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows." (49:32)
*One Minute Drills: The cast has 60 seconds to describe their character's personality, history, relationships and other traits before time runs out (6:43)
*What's On Your Mind: Hosted by Tom Felton, the cast is put on the spot when asked a series of rapid-fire questions on their likes and dislikes. (6:41)
*Universal's "The Wizarding World of Harry Potter" Sneak Peek: Get an "inside look" at the amazing world of magic and excitement being created at Universal Orlando® Resort in Florida (11:38)
*Digital Copy of the theatrical film (2nd disc)
*RRP $34.99

I can't believe the negative reviews. I read the book and thought the filmmakers did a fantastic job with it. Anyone who wants a film to be an exact replica of any book should do themselves a favor and just read the book again. Am looking forward to enjoying it again (and again) on DVD.

It gets darker and darker...
The following is a review of the movie, and I will be updating the review of the DVD (which I have pre-ordered) once I receive it:

I loved the book. There are various elements and story arcs running through the book that I could not help but wonder how the director [David Yates] was going to pull it off. Well, the movie is definitely much more subdued than its predecessors, both in the effects, the violence, the use of witchcraft, even the color palette is muted for most of the movie, conveying a sense of menace and possible doom in the confrontation between good and evil.

As an ardent fan of the books, and also the movies, I found this particular installment a tad underwhelming. Firstly, I was vexed that the scriptwriters felt they had to include unnecessary scenes that were not even in the book [the waitress and Harry making a date at the beginning, the burning down of the Burrow, etc]. Instead, they left out bits that were actually in the books. Even crucial story arcs, like the use of the Pensieve is not given enough screen time, and seems almost rushed.

One of the enduring appeal of the movie franchise lies in its sense of wonder, and being able to transport viewers into a magical realm, where the evil forces under the tutelage of the dark lord Voldemort try to vanquish the forces of good as portrayed by Harry Potter, the Chosen One and also the Order of the Phoenix. In this latest movie installment, I felt that the element of wonder was lacking. Much of what is portrayed is presented as it is, and if this was watched by someone new to the world of Harry Potter, the person would be bewildered and lost. At least in the other installments, especially in the first four, a lot of background information is provided [so that even my husband, who has not read any books in the series was able to follow the story]. For example, there is no hint whatsoever as to why Bellatrix Lestrange has such a venomous hatred of Harry, nor why Harry is bent on going after her [and I'm not saying why here either, for the sake of HP virgins].

I guess part of the problem is that HP & the Half-Blood Prince provides the catalyst for the events that are to transpire in the last book, Deathly Hallows, and the movie version is to be played out in two parts. So, understandably, a lot of ground work is laid out here, resulting in a dialogue heavy movie, and less than spectacular special effects [the Quidditch scene was completely underwhelming in my opinion]. The main characters , such as Harry [Daniel Radcliffe], Hermione [Emma Watson], and Ron [Rupert Grint] are also facing some serious hormone issues and relationship problems, hence the rather subdued tone. Gone are the days of easy bantering and camaraderie...the dynamics between the three have shifted to one of awkward uneasiness, as Ron and Hermione try to come to terms with the changes in their friendship, and Harry deals with his strong attraction to Ginny Weasley. In this, I felt the actors did a great job - the three have come a long way from their first year at Hogwarts, and have truly embraced these roles, portraying them with depth and insight.

Draco Malfoy's role as portrayed by Tom Felton, finally gets more visibility. Draco is no longer merely glowering all the time, but deals with some real problems that may cost him his very soul, and Felton did a credible job portraying his inner conflict. Michael Gambon is excellent as Dumbledore, relying more heavily on Harry in this story, as he tries desperately to uncover Potions Professor Slughorn's [Jim Broadbent]one crucial memory concerning Tom Riddle [the Dark Lord] that may help in their fight against the Dark Lord.

The others such as Severus Snape [Alan Rickman], Minerva McGonagall [Maggie Smith],& Hagrid [Robbie Coltrane] have less visibility this time around. It really does focus on a just a few central characters, though Snape does play an important role here [just that he doesn't get as much screen time as I would have liked]. With regards to Snape, I have to say I'm a great fan of Alan Rickman's acting - he brings great depth to the portrayal of the Hogwarts teacher, eliciting reactions that vary from disgust to anger and even sympathy through the course of the six installments. He impresses even in minor scenes. I do look forward to more of Snape in the last two installments as his role is pivotal to the series! As for the stern but kind-hearted Prof McGonagall, I have read some reports as to Dame Maggie Smith's ill health and pray that she is well enough to complete the last two movies, as I simply cannot imagine any other actress in her role.

All in all, it is still an engrossing tale, and I have pre-ordered the DVD. The reason I only gave it three stars is because it did not stay as faithful to the book as I would have liked, and lacked the great big sense of wonder & magic I've come to associate with the series. This has been the darkest installment in the series thus far - so I can understand the depressing tone underlying the movie, yet, I still feel the director could have used better colors and lightened up some aspects of the movie where appropriate. Btw, I found the score completely underwhelming, and I really miss the wonderful score that was in the earlier movies [except Part 5]. Here's hoping Deathly Hallows Part I and II will fare better [also directed by David Yates].

A vast improvement over "Order of the Phoenix"
My main gripe with the previous Harry Potter movie "Order of the Phoenix" was that for some strange reason they took the longest of the books and turned it into the shortest Harry Potter movie to date. The result was that I felt like I was watching the movie fly by on a speeding train, as it rushed from one key event to another without really taking the time to explore anything in detail.

Now we follow up with "Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince" and....what a difference. There are plenty of cuts of course, no Harry Potter movie can be free of cuts without being waaaay too long. But the movie's length was at least comparable to some of the others. The 3 lead characters were as spot on as ever. Michael Gambon finally brings a bit more warmth to his portrayal of Albus Dumbledor than he brought to the last few movies. Tom Felton played Draco Malfoy with all the depth one would hope for in his most important role in the series. Alan Rickman isn't seen too much as Severus Snape, but when he is he's as wonderful as ever.

I really think this may be the best Harry Potter film yet, and I was really starting to think after the last film that the story had gotten to big for them to manage in film. Good work guys.