Product Description

"The definitive book on the subject" of plagiarism (The New York Times) is updated with a new afterword about the Internet.

What is plagiarism, and why is it such a big deal? Since when is originality considered an indispensable attribute of authorship? Stolen Words is a deft and well-informed history of the sin every writer fears from every angle. Award-winning author Thomas Mallon begins in the seventeenth century and pushes forward toward scandals in publishing, academia, and Hollywood, exploring the motivations, consequences, and emotional reverberations of an intriguing and distressingly widespread practice. In this now-classic study, Mallon proves himself to be one of our most versatile, original, and delightful writers.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #343627 in Books
• Published on: 2001-04-19
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Binding: Paperback
• 336 pages

From Publishers Weekly
Mallon, who examined diaries in A Book of One's Own , here probes the opposite end of the literary spectrum: plagiarism. Although ably researched and enthusiastic and clever in tone, the book has an uneasy mix of topics which may preclude its finding an audience. With a close comparison of texts, Mallon discusses suspicious similarities between the works of Victorian novelist and international copyright champion Charles Reade and Frenchwoman Charles Reybaud, the writings of Jayme Sokolow and fellow academic Stephen Nissenbaum in the 1970s and '80s, and Anita Clay Kornfeld's 1980 generational novel Vintage and TV's Falcon Crest. Even though they've read about the case in the New York Times et al., publishing folk will undoubtedly be most attuned to the accusations against Jacob Epstein, who apologized in print for phrases apparently lifted from Martin Amis's The Rachel Papers and integrated into Epstein's 1979 Wild Oats. Mallon concludes that literary predators often are repeat offenders and society usually is timid about prosecuting their crimes. He warns: "To see the writer's words kidnapped, to find them imprisoned, like changelings, on someone else's equally permanent page, is to become vicariously absorbed by violation."
Copyright 1989 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal
Fine lines separate unconscious influence, adaptation, paraphrase, and downright theft by writers. In this scholarly and engaging look at the many aspects of unattributed use of others' writing, Mallon (English, Vassar) delves into cases famous and obscure, flagrant and doubtful, trying to identify the motives of the perpetrators while recounting the harm done victims copied from and the embarrassment and lame excuses that follow exposure. His book displays fine literary detective work. Besides discussing fiction and essays, Mallon reveals the seamy side of university scholarship, student term-paper services, television production, and recent political speeches. Does more of this go on than is generally recognized? With little else currently available in book form, this up-to-date study is firmly recommended.
- William A. Donovan, Chicago P.L.
Copyright 1989 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Review
"...manages to cover so much ground and blow away so much of the fog surrounding plagiarism . . . Lively, engrossing, and provocative." -- Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, The New York Times

"Elegant and entertaining." -- Newsday

"Elegant and entertaining."-Newsday

-- Review

"Mallon possesses grace and wit, a delight in incongruity, and a quickness to love hard, and grow furious." -- Los Angeles Times

Customer Reviews

Nothing New Under the Sun
Seeing that this book had not yet garnered any reviews, I thought I would put in a word for Mallon's engrossing and fast-paced study of what is (to my mind anyway) a fascinating topic. In light of recent revelations about the work of Kearns Goodwin and Ambrose, it makes for a timely and lively read. In his opening thumbnail sketch of the history of plagiarism, Mallon shows how major literary figures such as Laurence Sterne, Coleridge and de Quincey infused their works with ample unattributed borrowings. (Sterne, for instance, stole heavily from Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy -- even going so far as to plagiarize a passage about plagiarism -- and plagiarized his own love letters to his wife in letters he sent to his mistress years later.) The real gems here, though, are Mallon's discussion of modern scandals. Mallon writes about the novel "Wild Oats" by Jacob Epstein, a late '70s lit wonder boy with all the connections, who fell from grace when his plagiarisms of Martin Amis's "Rachel Papers" were revealed. (Reading Epstein's novel, the passages stolen from Amis seem to Mallon like "plateaus on otherwise flat land," roughly.) And in the cleverly titled chapter "Quiet Goes the Don," about former Texas Tech history professor Jamie Sokolow, Mallon shows how reluctant the academic establishment, down to the AAUP and American Historical Association, was to take action against an obvious and known plagiarist. (Sokolow, after he was coaxed out of Texas Tech, ended up evaluating historical research for the NEH in Washington.)

This book fascinatingly plumbs the psychology of the plagiarist, for example his seeming desire to get caught. (Epstein's novel features students who buy essays from term-paper companies, and a child who is punished for plagiarizing Winnie the Pooh.) An afterword on the internet is interesting but too brief, and the postmodernist challenge to authorship is dealt with too lightly and dismissively for my tastes; however, I would heartily recommend this book to anyone interested in the subject. For further reading, I would suggest a memoir by Neal Bowers, a victim of plagiarism, called "Words for the Taking." Also Anne Fadiman's essay in Ex Libris (from which I have "stolen" my title, heh heh). Of course, she had her own sources.

Somewhat Outdated, but Still Somewhat Relevant
Billed as "The Classic Book On Plagiarism" in the subtitle of this work, Thomas Mallon's Stolen Words is somewhat outdated by now in the first decade of the new Millennium.

That's not to say the discussion of some older cases of plagiarism isn't interesting. Mallon's skill with words is quite evident in his discussion of these older cases such as the Epstein affair, the Falcon Crest hubbub, and other instances of plagiarism from the 1980s. To be fair there is a new "Afterword" on plagiarism in the most recent reprints.

But what about some of the most recent cases of plagiarism to break such as the Jayson Blair farce at the New York Times? The Jack Kelley flap at the USA Today? The Internet plagiarism and cheatsite/term-paper mill industry which has burgeoned since the early 1990s and on into the 2000s? These are missing from what is otherwise an excellent treatise on plagiarism, including a psychological analysis of the phenomenon.

To sum up then, Stolen Words is somewhat dated at this point, possibly still worth the read, but likely not to make a connection with the younger generation of readers in particular. Academically stimulating and more useful for historical cases than current happenings with the plagiarism phenomenon.


Dr. Herbert Ulysses Quickwit