Judicial decisions: after-acquire evidence. (US District Court, DC): An article from: Security Management
|
| Price: | $5.95 |
Availability: Available for download now
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com
Product Description
This digital document is an article from Security Management, published by American Society for Industrial Security on December 1, 1996. The length of the article is 670 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: Both government and public employees who have been dismissed cannot be reinstated or given monetary awards based on the principle of after-acquire evidence. The law states that evidence of misconduct can be used against terminated employees even after dismissal from employment. This was the case against Dian Castle, who was initially awarded for unlawful dismissal. However, the court reversed its decision after Castle's employer showed that she plagiarized, a misconduct that warranted dismissal.
Citation Details
Title: Judicial decisions: after-acquire evidence. (US District Court, DC)
Author: Teresa Anderson
Publication: Security Management (Refereed)
Date: December 1, 1996
Publisher: American Society for Industrial Security
Volume: v40 Issue: n12 Page: p111(1)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
Product Details
- Published on: 1996-12-01
- Released on: 2005-07-28
- Format: HTML
- Binding: Digital
- 3 pages