Product Description

Age play is a form of role play enjoyed by many adults worldwide. Age play never involves biological children and is a role play for consenting adults only. As you will read in this issue, there is no “one way” to live out the role one chooses. We have collected a gallery of age players from across the country who cover a wide scope of different orientations and personalities. Each of the authors showcased in this edition will share their story and style with you. It is our desire that those looking for a place to begin their age play journey will find a path of direction that will help them move forward. For those who have started your path, may you gather fresh ideas and outlooks to add to and enhance your age play. Join us as we share our heartfelt joys, heartbreaking sorrows, moments of personal enlightenment, and just plain fun moments through the articles that follow.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #365906 in Books
• Published on: 2008-11-05
• Original language: English
• Binding: Paperback
• 92 pages

Customer Reviews

So basic it's pointless
This is just a collection of memoirs of age players and caretakers, comparable to anything that could be found online for free. All accounts appear to be un-edited, riddled with spelling and grammatical errors. There are only a couple of entries that offer any suggestions for age play in private and the accounts of specific experiences are written very plainly, offering only minimal details. I would only recommend this book if you are completely cut off from the age play community or have limited internet access. Otherwise, just join Fet Life or DL Town and save your money for something more interesting and fulfilling.

good for a small press, but misleading
Actually, the chapters in this book were not even originally intended to be in a book. They were intended to be published in a magazine. The magazine editor made the decision to become a book editor and published all of the articles in book format. So, the authors were mislead into the audience/context of how their articles were being read. The editing was poor and the cover wasn't the best representation.