This new book takes data from gazillions of generations of pathogens, and quantifies what undirected evolution can and can't achieve. Hard to argue with his data. The "edge" (limit of evolution's powers) Behe finds is higher than most IDers would put it (e.g. Behe can accept undirected origin of species). But if he's right, the grandiose claims of Darwinists will look ridiculous.

One of the most famous ID books. Controversial, but from my reading, it appears that Behe's thesis has not been successfully challenged. And Darwinists have been stealthily trying for years, but won't admit it.

A good antidote to the "IDiot" label.

A classic of the ID movement, written from a mathematical (probability) point of view. Often attacked and misunderstood (in my perception) by the opposition. Explains why ID is a positive inference, not a God-of-the-gaps bailout.

Hoyle is an award-winning cosmologist (and SF writer). He has written about the apparent purpose behind the universe, but in this book he goes after biology.

I know nothing about this book either.

Haven't heard about this one.

Sounds worthwhile.

A respected Italian geneticist dismantles Darwinism. For a review see http://www.arn.org/arnproducts/php/book_show_item.php?id=96