Evidence for the Resurrection
|
| List Price: | $22.99 |
| Price: | $15.63 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details |
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com
69 new or used available from $0.79
Average customer review:Product Description
Product Details
- Amazon Sales Rank: #547756 in Books
- Published on: 2009-02-02
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Binding: Hardcover
- 224 pages
Features
- ISBN13: 9780830747856
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
- Click here to view our Condition Guide and Shipping Prices
Editorial Reviews
From the Back Cover
About the Author
Customer Reviews
Misleading Title
I concur with another review. The title of this book is misleading. Most of the book builds the Biblical reason for needing Jesus. Which is great! But less than 1/4th is devoted to actual evidence of the resurrection.
I should of read some of this book before buying it. I already know why I need Jesus. Instead I wanted some academic reasons to prove the resurrection. What I got is a evangelistic book that shows why people need Jesus.
This book should be titled, "Why You Need Jesus."
Well said
This book makes it clear how one accepts God greatest gift, Jesus Christ as Savior. A good read for a new Christian or for someone searching for meaning in his/her life.
Not Up for the Challenge
Sad to say, in spite of Lucy's rather inane prose in the last review, the poor little fellow has a point. The title for this book ought to have actually been, "Evidence for What Happens When Some People Believe in the Resurrection" -- because indeed, the McDowells spend far more time on the "fringe benefits" of belief in the Resurrection than they do on the Resurrection as a historical event
The McDowells may not have chosen the title (usually, publishers do that), but whoever did choose it, it is inappropriate. Only one chapter truly is about "evidence for the Resurrection." There are also chapters about such things as historical knowledge and miracles, which are not specific to the Resurrection (though I am glad they are there). Most of the rest of the book is essentially an extended personal testimony feature, explaining why the Resurrection (assuming it happened) gives your life meaning and purpose, and shows just how much God (sentimentally) loves you. Nice. But it isn't "evidence for the Resurrection," not one bit of it.
The irony here is that the McDowells are taking this approach out of what is likely a perceived necessity. The selfish, "me me" generation -- which they recognize as a serious problem -- doesn't want to hear about history; they want to hear about what's in it for me -- er, them. Not that this approach is surprising. As when I interviewed him years ago, Josh McDowell remains convinced that personal testimony and experience is what converts people, as it did him. In contrast, Sean seems to have a much more realistic and practical perspective in the sections of the book he wrote, placing more emphasis on the Resurrection as a historical fact. I am wondering if we have him to thank for whatever depth this book has, which is still not very much. You won't see anything here to seriously prepare anyone for such challenges as The Empty Tomb and Carrier's two-body hypothesis, or even the "copycat savior" thesis. It is as though we're still dealing with objections dealt in the 1950s.
I would say that the utility of this book will be extremely limited -- perhaps to youth -- and may even do more harm than good without a following program of discipleship; otherwise, those who read it will continue to think "God did it for me, me, me" is the best part of the whole scheme. Yes, I'm happy to see this coming out of part of a special project by McDowell's ministry to teach in churches about the Resurrection; but I am also filled with dread at knowing that so many -- as happened with Evidence That Demands A Verdict -- will think they're getting the final word from McDowell, and will find themselves in a mental jam when someone pops modern critical arguments into the picture.
I really wish the McDowells had done a better job, but that will apparently have to be done by someone else.




