The Arian Controversy
|
| List Price: | $18.99 |
| Price: | $14.81 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details |
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com
20 new or used available from $10.98
Average customer review:Product Description
Professor Henry Melvill Gwatkin (1844-1916) was an English theologian and church historian. He was born at Barrow-on- Soar, Leicestershire. He was educated at St. John's College, Cambridge. He became Dixie Professor of Ecclesiastical History of the University of Cambridge in 1891, retiring in 1912. His works include: Studies of Arianism (1882), The Arian Controversy (1889), The Meaning of Ecclesiastical History (1891), Selections from Early Writers: Illustrative of Church History to the Time of Constantine (1893), The Church Past and Present: A Review of its History (as editor) (1900), The Eye for Spiritual Things, and Other Sermons (1906), The Knowledge of God and its Historical Development (2 volumes) (1906), Early Church History to A. D. 313 (1909), The Cambridge Medieval History, Volume I (as editor with J. P. Whitney) (1911), The Cambridge Medieval History, Volume II (as editor with J. B. Bury) (1913), The Confirmation Rubric: Whom Does it Bind (1914), Britain's Case Against Germany (1917), Church and State in England to the Death of Queen Anne (1917) and Sacrifice of Thankfulness (edited by L. de L. Gwatkin) (1917).
Product Details
- Amazon Sales Rank: #2025233 in Books
- Published on: 2007-06-18
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Binding: Paperback
- 140 pages
Customer Reviews
A Classic Treatment of the Arian Controversy
This brief history concerning the Arian Controversy is the fruitful product of many years of studies which the author, Henry M. Gwatkin, commenced upon during his tenor at Cambridge University. It is essentially an abridgement of his lectures and writings, and naturally, it is a complete revision of them as well. Even though there is a much more current edition available by R.P.C. Hanson, one cannot ignore this one since it is used extensively as a source by those who study the history of the Arian Controversy today.



