Product Description

In 1962, the young Eugene Rose undertook to write a monumental chronicle of the abandonment of Truth in the modern age. Of the hundreds of pages of material he compiled for this work, only the present essay has come down to us in completed form. Here Eugene reveals the core of all modern thought and life--the belief that all truth is relative--and shows how this belief has been translated into action in our century. Today, three decades after he wrote it, this essay is surely timelier than ever. It clearly explains why contemporary ideas, values, and attitudes--the "spirit of the age"--are shifting so rapidly in the direction of moral anarchy, as the philosophy of Nihilism enters more deeply into the fiber of society. Nietszche was right when he predicted that the 20th century would usher in "the triumph of Nihilism."

Indeed, the Christian is--in an ultimate sense--a "Nihilist"; to him, in the end, the world is nothing, and God is all. On the one hand, the true Nihilist places his faith in things that pass away and end in nothing. On the other hand, the Christian, renouncing such vanity, places his faith in the one thing that will not pass away, the Kingdom of God.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #479711 in Books
• Published on: 2001-12-01
• Original language: English
• Binding: Paperback

Features

• ISBN13: 9781887904063
• Condition: NEW
• Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
• Click here to view our Condition Guide and Shipping Prices

From the Author
Nihilism has become, in our time, so widespread and pervasive, has entered so deeply into the minds and hearts of all men living today, that there is no longer any 'front' on which it may be fought.

About the Author
Fr. Seraphim Rose (1934-1982) was an Orthodox monk in the ancient tradition that dedicated his life to reawakening modern Western man to forgotten spiritual truths. From his remote cabin in the mountains of northern California, he produced writings, which have been circulated throughout the world in millions of copies. Today he is Russia's best-loved spiritual writer. His books Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future and The Soul After Death have changed countless lives with their uncompromising and sobering truth.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
What does Nihilism mean? That the highest values are losing their value. There is no goal...There is no Truth, no 'thing in itself.' There is no answer to the question: why? --Friedrich Nietszche

Atheism, true 'existential atheism burning with hatred of a seemingly unjust or unmerciful God, is a spiritual state; it is a real attempt to grapple with the true God...Nietszche, in calling himself Antichrist, proved thereby his intense hunger for Christ.

Customer Reviews

Highly Illuminating
Father Seraphim (Eugene Rose) could write about this pernicious spirit, the spirit of nihilism, because he lived intoxicated by it himself. This brief expose describes that which drives modernity and is really a sign post for those genuinely searching for Truth from a philosophical angle. It will really only be interesting for those with a philosophical bent as it is rather 'brainy' in its whole premise. The author describes the philosophy from his Orthodox Christian worldview, he describes a modern, worldwide, cultural, philosophical, spiritual formation that can only be understood as a clear indicator of the world's place in history now, a time refered to in the Holy Scriptures as the Apostasy. Something I found interesting was Father Seraphim's reference to Hitler as simply a 'magician.' Nazi Germany (as well as the communist experiments) for Father Seraphim, was a massive and shocking manifestation of the spirit of nihilistic praxis, a manifestation that will culminate at the end of time in the person of the antichrist, who will also have magical, demonic powers to manipulate his following. Father Seraphim's book teaches us of the present to remind us of Truth, and warns us of the future, a darker, and more malignant image of today. It's worth the read, if you are inclined.

A physician diagnoses post-modern ills
I "met" Fr. Seraphim Rose, of blessed memory, through several books and short articles he wrote during my 4-year soujourn in Eastern Orthodoxy. This one on Nihilism is his best.

Now, Fr. Seraphim Rose spent his hieromonastic life in a very conservative (some may say traditionalist, others may say truly orthodox) body called the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia. After a life of intellectual pursuits and even dabbling into Buddhism, Eugene Rose converted to Orthodoxy and joined this ecclesial body and then co-founded a monastic community in California. Fr. Rose was deeply infuenced by traditional Russian Orthodox spirituality and mysticism, particularly that of the elders or "staretsi" of the Optina Monastery.

The quality of Fr. Seraphim Rose's work is uneven, at times truly erudite, at times approaching the tendency for shrill overstatement that characterizes so much of the Christian-Orthodox-Catholic ultra-traditionalist camps. Thankfully, Nihilism is mostly free from this tendency.

Fr. Seraphim followed a physician's approach in his Nihilism: first, he studied and described the symptoms, then he identified the underlying causes, then he prescribed a cure. The Introduction set the scope of Fr. Seraphim's critique of the modern age:

"What is the Nihilism in which we have seen the root of the Revolution of the modern age? The answer, at first thought, does not seem difficult; several obvious examples of it spring immediately to mind. There is Hitler's fantastic program of destruction, the Bolshevik Revolution, the Dadaist attack on art; there is the background from which these movements sprang, most notably represented by several "possessed" individuals of the late nineteenth century--poets like Rimbaud and Baudelaire, revolutionaries like Bakunin and Nechayev, "prophets" like Nietzsche; there is, on a humbler level among our contemporaries, the vague unrest that leads some to flock to magicians like Hitler, and others to find escape in drugs or false religions, or to perpetrate those "senseless" crimes that become ever more characteristic of these times. But these represent no more than the spectacular surface of the problem of Nihilism. To account even for these, once one probes beneath the surface, is by no means an easy task; but the task we have set for ourselves in this chapter is broader: to understand the nature of the whole movement of which these phenomena are but extreme examples."

Fr. Seraphim did not restrict himself to theology as one would expect from a monk, but also examined philosophy, art, music, politics, got to the critical core and then laid it bare. The result is a devastating critique of every assumption, every idea, underlying Western Civilization from the Enlightenment onwards.

Diagnosing Modernity
When he was still a catechumen of the Russian Church Abroad, long before he became Fr. Seraphim, Eugene Rose had a grand conception, which was a work to be entitled "The Kingdom of Man and the Kingdom of God"; it was to be a spiritual history of Mankind, and a comprehensive contrast between two disparate world-views, that which places its hope on the ability of Humanity to master itself and its environment, and that which places its hope soley on God, and looks to the advent of the heavenly kingdom at the end of this age as the only solution to the world's problems. Like most incredibly ambitious projects, it failed to be completed; all that came of it was a large pile of notes and one finished chapter. After his early death at the age of forty-eight, that chapter was published as "Nihilism".

After becoming a monk, Fr. Seraphim lost all interest in philosophical discourse as an end in itself, and his writing became much more down-to-earth, and focused entirely on "pastoral" concerns, though he continued to utilise his incisive intellect and profound scholarship in adressing these concerns. He refused to have this book published during his life, though urged to do so by a brother monk. Perhaps it was an ego thing with him, and he didn't want the temptation to intellectual pride that might result from its publication, but the work also seems very dark and heavy to many readers, so perhaps he didn't want to risk darkening any spirits in our already dark and oppresive times. I think it must remain an open question whether the author of this work would have been pleased by its publication.

For myself, I am glad the decision to publish was made; more than any other work, this book helped coalesce my view of intellectual history, bringing meaning to things before unclear to me. Fr. Seraphim is as good as Chesterton in that way; much less witty, of course, but also much more deeply spiritual. Not even his worst enemy could justly accuse Fr. Seraphim of frivolity.

The best parts of the book are the chapter where he diagnoses the different stages of nihilism, demonstrating that movements which seem wholly divergent and even contradictory are in fact involved in the same nihilist dialectic; the parts where he demonstrates that all characteristic modern movements are involved in this dialectic, especially his analysis of successive periods of modern art, in which he clearly sees the face of the "last Man" emerging, and the final chapter, in which he addresses the question "after Nihilism, what"? The last few paragraphs of the book have a power rarely to be found in any form of literature, let alone works on philosophical topics, which tend to be rather dry and listless.

The only problems with the book have to do with the editing, which is inferior to that of most of the other publications of St. Herman's. The editor's introduction presents a rather whimsical portrait of Eugene Rose, which wouldn't do much toward making me want to read the book if I weren't already inclined to do so. Likewise, the photo chosen to demonstrate Fr. Seraphim's "sobriety" of demeanour to me makes him look like one of the people who habitually wander through bus terminals, for whom sobriety is not the most notable feature. The essay appended to the end of the book reads like a first draft of the book itself, in that it covers much of the same material, but is much less precise in expression, and is wandering and disjointed; coming immediately after the most powerful paragraphs in the book, it in effect diminishes the impact the book would have if it were allowed to end on a high note. For those not accustomed to reading philosophical material, a glossary would be of great assistance.

Despite these detractions, this is a great book. If you are at all sympathetic with the author's perspective, it will resonate in the core of your being. Though it is a very short book, I can think of no other work which has so profoundly affected me.