Product Description

Ireland's Easter Rising of 1916 is one of the handful of modern historical events that instantly created its own mythology and changed millions of lives forever. Charles Townshend's remarkable new book vividly re-creates this extraordinary time when, as Irish insurgents rose up and occupied Dublin, as British artillery retaliated ferociously and flattened the city center, as the last haggard rebels surrendered and their leaders were shot, a powerful narrative was born and Ireland was launched into a new world. Scraping away layer upon layer of myth, Easter 1916 reveals an Ireland polarized, confused, and fearful, hovering on the brink of war between Nationalists and Unionists, and presenting Britain with a seemingly insoluble problem.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #474047 in Books
• Published on: 2006-05-25
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Binding: Hardcover
• 480 pages

Review
"This is a crisply written, balanced, and well-organized study..." -- Journal of Military History

...Summarizes some forty years of scholarship on the topic, adding its own dramatic flair and insights....A quite vivid reenactment. -- Library Bookwatch

Anyone interested in Irish history, of whatever political views, should be grateful to [Townshend] for pulling this material together and...for the wealth of detail. -- Live Journal

Enthralling and definitive...he writes with soldierly clarity but also delivers an emotional punch. -- Roy Foster in Times Literary Supplement

Peeling back the mythology to uncover the history. -- Martin Zimmerman in San Diego Union - Tribune

Peeling back the mythology to uncover the history. -- Martin Zimmerman in San Diego Union-Tribune

Remarkably evenhanded and insightful....The definitive study of the topic for all students of Irish history. -- Choice

The author may or may not have seen active military service but his interpretation of small unit actions and close-in fighting is sharp and realistic. -- John H. Carroll, Catholic News Service

Townshend is the first author to use the full compendium of the Irish Bureau of Military History records. -- HistoryWire.com

Vivid, authoritative and gripping, Easter 1916 is a major work. -- in Word Power

About the Author
Charles Townshend's previous publications include Terrorism: A very short Introduction, Political Violence in Ireland and The British Campaign in Ireland, 1919-1921..

Customer Reviews

Highly informative, but dull and not without bias
This is a story of an insurrection that led ineluctably - and against all odds - to a small nation's freedom, so here's an interesting question. How does an author manage to recount this rip-roaring tale such that his description of the prologue and aftermath are fascinating, but that the chapters on the action-packed rebellion itself are incomparably dull? Answer - with passages such as this:

"B Company was to take over Westland Row Station, and send a party up the line to Tara Street Station where they were to link up with 2nd Batallion which would be in charge of the Amiens St area. C Company would occupy Boland's bakery and dispensary, together with Roberts' builders yard and Clanwilliam House; barricade the canal bridges at Grand Canal Street, Mount Street, Baggot Street and Leeson Street, where they should join up with the 4th Battallion and/or the Citizen Army. D Company was to be based at Boland's mill, and patrol the section between the bakery and the quays. F Company was to occupy Kingstown harbour. (E Company, which came from St Enda's school, was specially detailed to form part of Pearse's HQ force)"
[p. 176]

Feel yourself nodding off? I worked for some years in offices in the area described above (specifically Westland Sq and Grand Canal Quay), and I can say that even I found this description just not worth ploughing through. (Some of the placenames mentioned above are not even on the book's map.) Chapters 6-8 of this book, which cover the events of Easter Week, consist of a stupefyingly dull logbook of such details. With the reader's nose thus pressed against history's canvas, all shape and sense of the story is lost. After sixty pages of such researcher-exhibitionism, the reader emerges with no strong sense as to what was happening, who was commanding whom, how the rebels were faring throughout, or even the proximate causes of the rebellion's end. It's a shame, because the remaining nine chapters, covering the prologue and aftermath, are very readable and informative. They are also, however, debatable.

Townshend's account, for a start, scarcely brushes the surface of the long chronicle of English brutality in Ireland, and he seem to assiduously sideline the idealism and heroism of the 1916 rebels. At my home village, for example, our local football field is named after two republican soldiers who were captured by the Black & Tans: one had all his fingernails torn out with a pliers before being shot and the other was killed after being tied to the back of a van and dragged behind it. Thus locals might find it rather difficult to swallow Townshend's claim that the spirit of the age was circumscribed by 'the characteristic British values of reasonableness, compromise and non-violence' (p. 31). Far more grating, however, is the book's persistently condescending tone. Townshend speaks of 'the laxity of [Pearse's] logic' [p. 15]; the 1798 Rebellion as 'a vicious *civil* war' [p. 24]; 'the semi-hysterical Irish-American Republican culture' [p. 50]; that Major John MacBride's 'sudden promotion was certainly due to his military reputation rather than his intervening experience as a water bailiff for the [sic] Dublin Corporation, or his famous drink problem' [p. 179]. And so on.

It's certainly true that the Easter rising was characterised by great confusion and many missed opportunities, But the more one reads this book, the more one senses what Townshend is trying to disguise - that he genuinely relishes playing up minor incidents which aggregate to make the 1916 Rebels appear clownish. He explains in the preface that he chose to subtitle the book 'The Irish Rebellion' because 'that term - "rebels" - carries a charge of romantic glamour which was wholly appropriate' [p. xviii]. With that in mind, it's surprising to find that this dryly written book manages to drain all sense of heroism, self-sacrifice and tragedy from a story that's suffused with all of these qualities. Pearse, Clarke and MacDonagh, for example, are shot rather matter-of-factly in one sentence [p. 279].

Townshend's analytical skills tend to break down during his peroration. It is a captious and empty point to make, for instance, that 'the planners of 1916 had shown little if any interest in alienating northern Unionist opinion, and the possibility that their action might cement the partition of Ireland' [p. 349]. As is well known, the Unionists responded to the abolition of the House of Lords veto (which had blocked two prior Home Rule bills but now could not block the forthcoming one) by forming themselves into a massively armed and aggressive militia. The leaders of 1916 - idealists all - could hardly have been expected to take on the might and materiel of the British Empire on one front whilst reaching some sort of 'compromise' with the most extreme adherents to that Empire on another front. Asking Irish nationalism to find an accommodation with such militant anti-nationalism would be asking rather too much.

Morover, it's easy to see which of the two political entities is in the better position today - the Republic is independent and its long-term future is solidly secure, while the Northern Unionists, still clingingly dolefully to an anachronistic relationship (featuring no mutual warmth) with a post-Imperial Britain, will be outpopulated By Irish nationalists within decades and are merely prolonging the inevitable. Townshend nevers chides the Unionists for failing to consider the long-term prospects of cementing a partition in which their half was always going to become the far less viable political entity.

Additionally, Townshend does not trouble to rebut the revisionist Francis Shaw's breathtaking claim that Home Rule was 'a realistic and achievable goal' - a claim which completely ignores (i) the manner in which Ireland's 'internal majority' in favour of Home Rule always found themselves frustrated in Westminster by a four-to-one 'external majority' against; and (ii) whether or not it was culturally desirable in the first place. It might plausibly be argued that the volcano of Irish nationalism which burst through following 1916 was hardly 'created' by the event itself, but had been bubbling beneath the surface all along. How we are supposed to square this with the plausibility of perpetual subordination to England is unclear. Not only did the British fail to kill Home Rule with kindness, the 1916 Rising demonstrated that Home Rule, even if granted, would not have gone far enough.

Nevertheless, read as a desiccated factual account this book is certainly informative about the causes and consequences of the Rising. It deserves credit for placing the insurrection within the context of World War I, which few histories of this period seem to trouble with. However, it must be said that the centre has fallen out of the book: the account of Easter week itself is detailed to the point of incomprehensibility, and thus the most exciting part of the story has been left poorly told.

a good blow by blow account of the Easter Rebellion
Charles Townshend has written a fairly good book on the Irish Easter Rebellion of 1916. Meticulously researched and quite informative; any reader interested by the events will enjoy the book.

Yet on a larger level this book doesn't completely satisfy its readers, because it is essentially a political and military history of events that were more than simply a matter of politics and military science. What brought men and women to stage an uprising that they knew couldn't succeed, and would lead to their leaders' executions? Was it patriotism? Was it frustration with their lot? This is where the events around that week no longer are the exclusive domain of historians, but also of dramatists and psychologists.

This lack brought to mind Macaulay's observations on the Irish: "The Irish were distinguished by qualities which tend to make men interesting rather than prosperous. They were an ardent and impetuous race, easily moved to tears or to laughter, to fury or to love. Alone among the nations of northern Europe they had the susceptibility, the vivacity, the natural turn for acting and rhetoric, which are indigenous on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea...The genius, with which her aboriginal inhabitants were largely endowed showed itself as yet only in ballads which wild and rugged as they were, seemed to the judging eye of Spenser to contain a portion of the pure gold of poetry."

A book that would adequately capture this element of the Irish soul would be a truly amazing book, as it is, this is "only" a good book.

Very informative. A little ponderous at times.
This book was very informative about the history of the Irish "Troubles." The information was well researched and it flowed in such a way as to make it easier to understand without being overly simplistic.
At times the military information was so detailed that the flow was slowed a little. This is, however, the most concise book I've read on the subject and leaves the reader with a more comfortable understanding of the basis of a very complex political issue.