Product Details
Memorex 8.5GB 8X Double Layer DVD+R (25pk Spindle)

Memorex 8.5GB 8X Double Layer DVD+R (25pk Spindle)
From Memorex

List Price: $49.99
Price: $24.69 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com

38 new or used available from $16.50

Average customer review:

Product Description

Memorex DVD+R 8.5GB Double Layer 8x 25 Pack Spindle


Product Details

  • Color: Silver
  • Brand: Memorex
  • Model: 32025712
  • Platform: Windows
  • Format: CD
  • Original language: English
  • Dimensions: 2.50" h x 5.75" w x 5.75" l, .90 pounds

Features

  • Double layer technology
  • 8.5GB capacity
  • 240-minute recording time
  • 8X recording speed
  • 25 disc spindle

Customer Reviews

No from a Mac user1
For a long time, Memorex was the only Double Layer option for me because of price. I never really had a hard time with the 2X discs burning on the Pioneer burners (DVR-110D and 111D) in most Macs. The new 8X discs are a completely different story. I've lost at least half of the discs. I switched from DragonBurn to Toast8, with improved results for a few burns, but then more "sense errors" a quarter to halfway through the burn. The reality is Memorex DL media is not preferred media for the Pioneer drives. It was never a problem till this new 8X batch. Buy at your own risk!

Buy at your own risk2
I had bought a 15 pack spindle of these DVD DLs and it worked just fine, so I figured I'd go with the best deal since they are the best priced DVD DLs out there and I bought a 25 pack spindle. About 8 DVDs into it and not one worked. I burned SONY and HP DVDs just fine but this spindle of Memorex is a complete waste of money.

I've tried contacting Memorex via email to get my money back but so far they've just ignored me. I will no longer be purchasing Memorex, in the end you really save no money buying these discs since you throw so many of them out...

No good1
I bought the 50 pack and the first 6 I tried failed when burning into layer 2. I've never had this problem before. Waste of money and, more importantly, wasted a lot of time.